https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20160219/15165433654/dissecting-dismantling-myths-dojs-motion-to-compel-apple-to-build-backdoor.shtml
After the article here is a single comment that seems to summarize my feelings pretty well. "The claim that this order has nothing to do with any other phone is laughable. Farook destroyed his personal phone. Why did he not destroy this phone? Obviously, it has no data that is useful to investigators. As pointed out in the article, he used the phone to communicate with work colleagues, so why not get the data off those phones? The FBI knows all this, so why waste resources on this phone? *The only reason is that the FBI thinks that this is a case where people will sympathise with them and this will help the FBI establish a precedent.*" On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 7:01 PM, Bill Prince <[email protected]> wrote: > bet that smarts. > > Hate it when I get my flash probed... > > bp > <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> > > > On 2/19/2016 4:10 PM, [email protected] wrote: > > Pretty sure they could probe the flash if they had to. > > *From:* Bill Prince <[email protected]> > *Sent:* Friday, February 19, 2016 5:06 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT Apple > > That's why all the back doors to Huawei equipment are secret. > > Realistically, Apple shouldn't need to do anything. Let the battery run > down, and remove the storage chip(s). Give the storage chip(s) to the NSA, > and let them hack away at it. Depending on how important it is (or isn't), > and how much computing power they bring to bear, they will get whatever > they want. > > bp > <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> > > > On 2/19/2016 2:52 PM, Sean Heskett wrote: > > If the Chinese government had a known back door into all huawei or leveno > products would you ever buy anything from them??? > > 2 cents > > -Sean > > On Friday, February 19, 2016, < <[email protected]>[email protected]> wrote: > >> Treason? >> > > >
