A perspective: http://blogmaverick.com/2016/02/18/apple-vs-the-fbi-vs-a-suggestion/
Another: http://lauren.vortex.com/archive/001155.html On Feb 19, 2016 6:23 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > What is wrong with the FBI having this ability? How does that have a > negative impact on me? > I could argue that it has a positive benefit to the nation. > > *From:* Travis Johnson <[email protected]> > *Sent:* Friday, February 19, 2016 5:15 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT Apple > > I don't think that's the case.... do you really see the FBI turning the > phone over to Apple? What happens if Apple comes back a week later and says > "oops, sorry... we nuked it". The FBI wants Apple to write a new IOS > version that will not erase the phone after 10 attempts at the login code. > Then the FBI would load that onto the phone, and attempt to brute force the > phone combo. > > At that point, the FBI could do that to any phone in the future as well. > > Apple is doing the right thing here. > > Travis > > > On 2/19/2016 4:05 PM, George Skorup wrote: > > As I understand it, that is exactly what the gov is asking them for. FBI > wants Apple to decrypt and send over the data. Nothing more. No "software > on every phone" to do this. Just that ONE phone. Get the data, then > incinerate the device. > > On 2/19/2016 4:59 PM, Nate Burke wrote: > > But they're not actually asking for a back door, are they?� They're just > saying 'hey, we have this physical device, can we give it to you, and you > get us the data off of it'?� I've got to think that the Engineers at > apple have a way to do this thought up.� > > Although at the same time, If they're trying to unlock the phone, couldn't > the Gov't with it's vast resources, just simply make a bit by bit copy of > the flash chip in the phone and just go through and try every unlock code? > > On 2/19/2016 4:54 PM, Josh Reynolds wrote: > > Yup. Google agrees as well. > On Feb 19, 2016 4:52 PM, "Sam Lambie" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Screw the govt. Apple is doing entirely doing the right thing. >> >> On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 3:47 PM, Nate Burke <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> My Boss and I just had a discussion about this, he think that Cook >>> should be in Jail for failing to comply with the order.� >>> >>> On 2/19/2016 4:46 PM, Josh Reynolds wrote: >>> >>> ... What? >>> >>> Seriously? >>> On Feb 19, 2016 4:44 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Treason? >>>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> -- >> *Sam Lambie* >> Taosnet Wireless Tech. >> 575-758-7598 Office >> www.Taosnet.com <http://www.newmex.com> >> > > > >
