I'm not saying I don't need a house burned down. ;) -Ty
-Ty On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 10:48 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm < [email protected]> wrote: > you need a house burned down? because what im hearing here is you need a > house burned down. > > On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 10:38 AM, Ty Featherling <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> True. Part 101 is like Part 15 in that regard. >> >> -Ty >> >> >> >> -Ty >> >> On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 10:36 AM, Hardy, Tim <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> A part 101 license (other than area-wide licenses or bands that were >>> auctioned) does not grant “exclusive use” of a frequency at a location. >>> >>> >>> >>> *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Ken Hohhof >>> *Sent:* Friday, February 26, 2016 11:32 AM >>> *To:* [email protected] >>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Unlicensed for dummies >>> >>> >>> >>> When did they go up there? Was it before U-NII-1 was opened up? Maybe >>> you can argue that is a separate band, since it wasn’t even available when >>> they located there. >>> >>> >>> >>> It is common for a lease to specify exclusivity on that tower for >>> certain unlicensed bands, or to contain a non-interference clause. >>> Apparently the lease doesn’t specify. Probably the city won’t want to get >>> involved, that’s why it’s easiest for a site owner to only allow one >>> unlicensed tenant, or one per band, they don’t want to play Judge Judy in a >>> technical area they know nothing about. >>> >>> >>> >>> Maybe show the city a copy of one of your Part 101 licenses showing you >>> have exclusive use of that frequency at those locations. Or borrow a 2-way >>> license from somebody in the area and show the city a copy. Or find a >>> cellular or paging company that is on a city structure, look up and make a >>> copy of their FCC license. Tell the city this is the paperwork someone >>> will have if the FCC has granted them exclusive use of spectrum, and of >>> course the other tenant will not have anything of the kind to show. Maybe >>> then turn their WiFi router upside down and show them the Part 15 sticker >>> so they can understand this is exactly the same rules you and the other >>> tenant are operating under. It would be like saying you can’t use WiFi >>> because your next door neighbor had WiFi first. >>> >>> >>> >>> That’s not how unlicensed works. That’s not how any of this works. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> *From:* Jaime Solorza <[email protected]> >>> >>> *Sent:* Friday, February 26, 2016 10:14 AM >>> >>> *To:* Animal Farm <[email protected]> >>> >>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Unlicensed for dummies >>> >>> >>> >>> The basic part 15 rule says it all >>> >>> On Feb 26, 2016 9:13 AM, "Ty Featherling" <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> We have a co-tennant on a water tower saying that since they were there >>> first, they get exclusive use of the entire 5GHz unlicensed band. There >>> lease warrants no such thing and we told the the FCC doesn't either. Is >>> there a plain english "for dummies" explanation of Part 15, specifically >>> regarding interference and co-location? The city is involved and we need to >>> make this stupid easy to understand. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -Ty >>> >> >> > > > -- > If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team > as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >
