I soo had the urge to post a couple GPS coordinates... From: That One Guy /sarcasm Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 10:37 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Unlicensed for dummies
im just sayin, if there was a house, and im not sayin there is, and it burned down, and im not sayin it will, there should probably be, say a gps coordinate, or street address of a house that nobody wants to see burned down. sometimes things happen. I stepped on a nail last night, somebodies house might burn down, a tree might fall in the forest, some things are just outside our control. On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 11:07 AM, Chuck McCown <[email protected]> wrote: God heard me say, don’t burn his house... From: Ty Featherling Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 10:05 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Unlicensed for dummies I'm not saying I don't need a house burned down. ;) -Ty -Ty On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 10:48 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm <[email protected]> wrote: you need a house burned down? because what im hearing here is you need a house burned down. On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 10:38 AM, Ty Featherling <[email protected]> wrote: True. Part 101 is like Part 15 in that regard. -Ty -Ty On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 10:36 AM, Hardy, Tim <[email protected]> wrote: A part 101 license (other than area-wide licenses or bands that were auctioned) does not grant “exclusive use” of a frequency at a location. From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ken Hohhof Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 11:32 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Unlicensed for dummies When did they go up there? Was it before U-NII-1 was opened up? Maybe you can argue that is a separate band, since it wasn’t even available when they located there. It is common for a lease to specify exclusivity on that tower for certain unlicensed bands, or to contain a non-interference clause. Apparently the lease doesn’t specify. Probably the city won’t want to get involved, that’s why it’s easiest for a site owner to only allow one unlicensed tenant, or one per band, they don’t want to play Judge Judy in a technical area they know nothing about. Maybe show the city a copy of one of your Part 101 licenses showing you have exclusive use of that frequency at those locations. Or borrow a 2-way license from somebody in the area and show the city a copy. Or find a cellular or paging company that is on a city structure, look up and make a copy of their FCC license. Tell the city this is the paperwork someone will have if the FCC has granted them exclusive use of spectrum, and of course the other tenant will not have anything of the kind to show. Maybe then turn their WiFi router upside down and show them the Part 15 sticker so they can understand this is exactly the same rules you and the other tenant are operating under. It would be like saying you can’t use WiFi because your next door neighbor had WiFi first. That’s not how unlicensed works. That’s not how any of this works. From: Jaime Solorza Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 10:14 AM To: Animal Farm Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Unlicensed for dummies The basic part 15 rule says it all On Feb 26, 2016 9:13 AM, "Ty Featherling" <[email protected]> wrote: We have a co-tennant on a water tower saying that since they were there first, they get exclusive use of the entire 5GHz unlicensed band. There lease warrants no such thing and we told the the FCC doesn't either. Is there a plain english "for dummies" explanation of Part 15, specifically regarding interference and co-location? The city is involved and we need to make this stupid easy to understand. -Ty -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
