in your best christopher walken voice Jaime Solorza Wireless Systems Architect 915-861-1390
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 10:37 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm < [email protected]> wrote: > im just sayin, if there was a house, and im not sayin there is, and it > burned down, and im not sayin it will, there should probably be, say a gps > coordinate, or street address of a house that nobody wants to see burned > down. sometimes things happen. I stepped on a nail last night, somebodies > house might burn down, a tree might fall in the forest, some things are > just outside our control. > > On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 11:07 AM, Chuck McCown <[email protected]> wrote: > >> God heard me say, don’t burn his house... >> >> *From:* Ty Featherling <[email protected]> >> *Sent:* Friday, February 26, 2016 10:05 AM >> *To:* [email protected] >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Unlicensed for dummies >> >> I'm not saying I don't need a house burned down. ;) >> >> -Ty >> >> >> >> -Ty >> >> On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 10:48 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> you need a house burned down? because what im hearing here is you need a >>> house burned down. >>> >>> On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 10:38 AM, Ty Featherling < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> True. Part 101 is like Part 15 in that regard. >>>> >>>> -Ty >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -Ty >>>> >>>> On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 10:36 AM, Hardy, Tim <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> A part 101 license (other than area-wide licenses or bands that were >>>>> auctioned) does not grant “exclusive use” of a frequency at a location. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Ken Hohhof >>>>> *Sent:* Friday, February 26, 2016 11:32 AM >>>>> *To:* [email protected] >>>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Unlicensed for dummies >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> When did they go up there? Was it before U-NII-1 was opened up? >>>>> Maybe you can argue that is a separate band, since it wasn’t even >>>>> available >>>>> when they located there. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> It is common for a lease to specify exclusivity on that tower for >>>>> certain unlicensed bands, or to contain a non-interference clause. >>>>> Apparently the lease doesn’t specify. Probably the city won’t want to get >>>>> involved, that’s why it’s easiest for a site owner to only allow one >>>>> unlicensed tenant, or one per band, they don’t want to play Judge Judy in >>>>> a >>>>> technical area they know nothing about. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Maybe show the city a copy of one of your Part 101 licenses showing >>>>> you have exclusive use of that frequency at those locations. Or borrow a >>>>> 2-way license from somebody in the area and show the city a copy. Or find >>>>> a cellular or paging company that is on a city structure, look up and make >>>>> a copy of their FCC license. Tell the city this is the paperwork someone >>>>> will have if the FCC has granted them exclusive use of spectrum, and of >>>>> course the other tenant will not have anything of the kind to show. Maybe >>>>> then turn their WiFi router upside down and show them the Part 15 sticker >>>>> so they can understand this is exactly the same rules you and the other >>>>> tenant are operating under. It would be like saying you can’t use WiFi >>>>> because your next door neighbor had WiFi first. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> That’s not how unlicensed works. That’s not how any of this works. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> *From:* Jaime Solorza <[email protected]> >>>>> >>>>> *Sent:* Friday, February 26, 2016 10:14 AM >>>>> >>>>> *To:* Animal Farm <[email protected]> >>>>> >>>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Unlicensed for dummies >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> The basic part 15 rule says it all >>>>> >>>>> On Feb 26, 2016 9:13 AM, "Ty Featherling" <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> We have a co-tennant on a water tower saying that since they were >>>>> there first, they get exclusive use of the entire 5GHz unlicensed band. >>>>> There lease warrants no such thing and we told the the FCC doesn't either. >>>>> Is there a plain english "for dummies" explanation of Part 15, >>>>> specifically >>>>> regarding interference and co-location? The city is involved and we need >>>>> to >>>>> make this stupid easy to understand. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -Ty >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team >>> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>> >> >> > > > > -- > If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team > as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >
