thats population covered On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 4:04 AM, Josh Reynolds <[email protected]> wrote:
> > http://www.fiercewireless.com/story/t-mobile-well-cover-30m-40m-new-pops-year/2016-03-03 > > :) > On Mar 3, 2016 9:44 PM, "Ken Hohhof" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Where did you see this? “POP” in the spectrum licensing context usually >> means population covered, as in the price is $X per MHZ-POP >> >> *From:* Josh Reynolds <[email protected]> >> *Sent:* Thursday, March 03, 2016 8:49 PM >> *To:* [email protected] >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Verizon argues for combining 37 GHz, 39 GHz into >> single band for 5G - FierceWirelessTech >> >> >> TMobile said they plan on pushing out 30-40 MILLION pops this year. >> Obviously pop is loosely defined. >> >> That's how all the cell carriers see this playing out. LTE will be more >> ubiquitous than WiFi when they are done. >> On Mar 3, 2016 8:43 PM, "Jason McKemie" <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> I'm still not sure how they're planning on circumventing physics. >>> Frequencies this high aren't going to go through much of anything, so >>> either they're going to have to have an insane number of microcell or >>> they're just using it for tower to tower applications. Either way, >>> they're only going to be serving areas that likely already have various >>> high speed options. This isn't something that is going to help spread high >>> speed Internet to underserved or unserved areas. >>> >>> That's not how they're going to pitch it to the general public though... >>> >>> On Thursday, March 3, 2016, Jaime Solorza <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> http://www.fiercewireless.com/tech/story/verizon-argues-combining-37-ghz-39-ghz-single-band-5g/2016-01-15 >>>> >>>
