right after they buy XO and get some 38 ghz licenses? On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 4:18 AM, Gino Villarini <[email protected]> wrote:
> thats population covered > > On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 4:04 AM, Josh Reynolds <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> >> http://www.fiercewireless.com/story/t-mobile-well-cover-30m-40m-new-pops-year/2016-03-03 >> >> :) >> On Mar 3, 2016 9:44 PM, "Ken Hohhof" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Where did you see this? “POP” in the spectrum licensing context usually >>> means population covered, as in the price is $X per MHZ-POP >>> >>> *From:* Josh Reynolds <[email protected]> >>> *Sent:* Thursday, March 03, 2016 8:49 PM >>> *To:* [email protected] >>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Verizon argues for combining 37 GHz, 39 GHz into >>> single band for 5G - FierceWirelessTech >>> >>> >>> TMobile said they plan on pushing out 30-40 MILLION pops this year. >>> Obviously pop is loosely defined. >>> >>> That's how all the cell carriers see this playing out. LTE will be more >>> ubiquitous than WiFi when they are done. >>> On Mar 3, 2016 8:43 PM, "Jason McKemie" < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> I'm still not sure how they're planning on circumventing physics. >>>> Frequencies this high aren't going to go through much of anything, so >>>> either they're going to have to have an insane number of microcell or >>>> they're just using it for tower to tower applications. Either way, >>>> they're only going to be serving areas that likely already have various >>>> high speed options. This isn't something that is going to help spread high >>>> speed Internet to underserved or unserved areas. >>>> >>>> That's not how they're going to pitch it to the general public >>>> though... >>>> >>>> On Thursday, March 3, 2016, Jaime Solorza <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> http://www.fiercewireless.com/tech/story/verizon-argues-combining-37-ghz-39-ghz-single-band-5g/2016-01-15 >>>>> >>>> >
