I would also add that there will be a great opportunity to lease carriers tower space if you map where they have towers now and shrink those coverages by 30% and film those gaps you'll be able to supply their tower demand as they try to increase speeds.
On Fri, Mar 4, 2016, 5:56 AM Lewis Bergman <[email protected]> wrote: > There are some pushing the idea of sites that cover about 250 meters > radius for super high speed. Obviously these would only be for some parts > of the top ten markets. > > On Fri, Mar 4, 2016, 2:21 AM Josh Reynolds <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Welp. That makes a lot more sense. Article is confusing. >> On Mar 4, 2016 2:18 AM, "Gino Villarini" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> thats population covered >>> >>> On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 4:04 AM, Josh Reynolds <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >> >>>> http://www.fiercewireless.com/story/t-mobile-well-cover-30m-40m-new-pops-year/2016-03-03 >>>> >>>> :) >>>> >>> On Mar 3, 2016 9:44 PM, "Ken Hohhof" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>> Where did you see this? “POP” in the spectrum licensing context usually >>>>> means population covered, as in the price is $X per MHZ-POP >>>>> >>>>> *From:* Josh Reynolds <[email protected]> >>>>> *Sent:* Thursday, March 03, 2016 8:49 PM >>>>> *To:* [email protected] >>>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Verizon argues for combining 37 GHz, 39 GHz >>>>> into single band for 5G - FierceWirelessTech >>>>> >>>>> >>>> TMobile said they plan on pushing out 30-40 MILLION pops this year. >>>>> Obviously pop is loosely defined. >>>>> >>>> That's how all the cell carriers see this playing out. LTE will be more >>>>> ubiquitous than WiFi when they are done. >>>>> On Mar 3, 2016 8:43 PM, "Jason McKemie" < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I'm still not sure how they're planning on circumventing physics. >>>>>> Frequencies this high aren't going to go through much of anything, so >>>>>> either they're going to have to have an insane number of microcell or >>>>>> they're just using it for tower to tower applications. Either way, >>>>>> they're only going to be serving areas that likely already have various >>>>>> high speed options. This isn't something that is going to help spread >>>>>> high >>>>>> speed Internet to underserved or unserved areas. >>>>>> >>>>>> That's not how they're going to pitch it to the general public >>>>>> though... >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thursday, March 3, 2016, Jaime Solorza <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> http://www.fiercewireless.com/tech/story/verizon-argues-combining-37-ghz-39-ghz-single-band-5g/2016-01-15 >>>>>>> >>>>>>
