There are some pushing the idea of sites that cover about 250 meters radius for super high speed. Obviously these would only be for some parts of the top ten markets.
On Fri, Mar 4, 2016, 2:21 AM Josh Reynolds <[email protected]> wrote: > Welp. That makes a lot more sense. Article is confusing. > On Mar 4, 2016 2:18 AM, "Gino Villarini" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> thats population covered >> >> On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 4:04 AM, Josh Reynolds <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > >>> http://www.fiercewireless.com/story/t-mobile-well-cover-30m-40m-new-pops-year/2016-03-03 >>> >>> :) >>> >> On Mar 3, 2016 9:44 PM, "Ken Hohhof" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >> Where did you see this? “POP” in the spectrum licensing context usually >>>> means population covered, as in the price is $X per MHZ-POP >>>> >>>> *From:* Josh Reynolds <[email protected]> >>>> *Sent:* Thursday, March 03, 2016 8:49 PM >>>> *To:* [email protected] >>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Verizon argues for combining 37 GHz, 39 GHz >>>> into single band for 5G - FierceWirelessTech >>>> >>>> >>> TMobile said they plan on pushing out 30-40 MILLION pops this year. >>>> Obviously pop is loosely defined. >>>> >>> That's how all the cell carriers see this playing out. LTE will be more >>>> ubiquitous than WiFi when they are done. >>>> On Mar 3, 2016 8:43 PM, "Jason McKemie" < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I'm still not sure how they're planning on circumventing physics. >>>>> Frequencies this high aren't going to go through much of anything, so >>>>> either they're going to have to have an insane number of microcell or >>>>> they're just using it for tower to tower applications. Either way, >>>>> they're only going to be serving areas that likely already have various >>>>> high speed options. This isn't something that is going to help spread high >>>>> speed Internet to underserved or unserved areas. >>>>> >>>>> That's not how they're going to pitch it to the general public >>>>> though... >>>>> >>>>> On Thursday, March 3, 2016, Jaime Solorza <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> http://www.fiercewireless.com/tech/story/verizon-argues-combining-37-ghz-39-ghz-single-band-5g/2016-01-15 >>>>>> >>>>>
