The desire for larger license areas meets their need to manage and file less. It is a management thing not a spectrum thing.
On Fri, Mar 4, 2016, 6:00 AM Lewis Bergman <[email protected]> wrote: > I would also add that there will be a great opportunity to lease carriers > tower space if you map where they have towers now and shrink those > coverages by 30% and film those gaps you'll be able to supply their tower > demand as they try to increase speeds. > > On Fri, Mar 4, 2016, 5:56 AM Lewis Bergman <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> There are some pushing the idea of sites that cover about 250 meters >> radius for super high speed. Obviously these would only be for some parts >> of the top ten markets. >> >> On Fri, Mar 4, 2016, 2:21 AM Josh Reynolds <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Welp. That makes a lot more sense. Article is confusing. >>> On Mar 4, 2016 2:18 AM, "Gino Villarini" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> thats population covered >>>> >>>> On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 4:04 AM, Josh Reynolds <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>> >>>>> http://www.fiercewireless.com/story/t-mobile-well-cover-30m-40m-new-pops-year/2016-03-03 >>>>> >>>>> :) >>>>> >>>> On Mar 3, 2016 9:44 PM, "Ken Hohhof" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>> Where did you see this? “POP” in the spectrum licensing context >>>>>> usually means population covered, as in the price is $X per MHZ-POP >>>>>> >>>>>> *From:* Josh Reynolds <[email protected]> >>>>>> *Sent:* Thursday, March 03, 2016 8:49 PM >>>>>> *To:* [email protected] >>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Verizon argues for combining 37 GHz, 39 GHz >>>>>> into single band for 5G - FierceWirelessTech >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> TMobile said they plan on pushing out 30-40 MILLION pops this year. >>>>>> Obviously pop is loosely defined. >>>>>> >>>>> That's how all the cell carriers see this playing out. LTE will be >>>>>> more ubiquitous than WiFi when they are done. >>>>>> On Mar 3, 2016 8:43 PM, "Jason McKemie" < >>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> I'm still not sure how they're planning on circumventing physics. >>>>>>> Frequencies this high aren't going to go through much of anything, so >>>>>>> either they're going to have to have an insane number of microcell or >>>>>>> they're just using it for tower to tower applications. Either way, >>>>>>> they're only going to be serving areas that likely already have various >>>>>>> high speed options. This isn't something that is going to help spread >>>>>>> high >>>>>>> speed Internet to underserved or unserved areas. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> That's not how they're going to pitch it to the general public >>>>>>> though... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Thursday, March 3, 2016, Jaime Solorza <[email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> http://www.fiercewireless.com/tech/story/verizon-argues-combining-37-ghz-39-ghz-single-band-5g/2016-01-15 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>
