I think you're trying to impart ethics on business. Most companies don't
like that at all, and only play by those rules when they have to - hence
most massive companies paying little to no taxes, and some like Verizon
getting money back every year.
On Mar 20, 2016 2:34 PM, "Jason McKemie" <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Except they outright stole it. Buying a company for the product or to
> eliminate competition may be immoral, but not the same as copying another
> company's product all the way down to the software bugs.
>
> On Sunday, March 20, 2016, Josh Reynolds <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> They did, sure. What they have now doesn't use that code anymore.
>>
>> I could say the same about many successful companies - they do what they
>> can get away with, and what makes their shareholders the most money.
>>
>> No different than a company buying one smaller company that had a good
>> product just to fire all the employees and kill it. Or companies that force
>> their staff to train their H1B or overseas replacements (Disney, HP, etc).
>> On Mar 20, 2016 2:10 PM, "Jason McKemie" <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> When it comes to Huawei I'm more referring to them just outright ripping
>>> other companies' products off - not so much software backdoors (many other
>>> companies do that).
>>>
>>> On Sunday, March 20, 2016, Faisal Imtiaz <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Oh grow up, get a grip.....
>>>>
>>>> The Chinese MFG are eating everyone's lunch.... all over the world.
>>>> The American and European MFG, are (Screwing) all the American and
>>>> European Companies like crazy on the premium pricing which is totally
>>>> unchecked... (Why does a SFP+ cost $65 from China and $1500 from Cisco etc
>>>> ?)
>>>>
>>>> And telling stories that create FUD to have folks keep away from doing
>>>> business with the overseas mfg. pays quiet well...
>>>>
>>>> Let's flip this argument for a moment... Do you think that Cisco /
>>>> Alcatel / Lucent / etc etc don't have some sort of backdoor built into
>>>> their products for the US/EU governments ?
>>>>
>>>> Why are you worried about an international gov. snooping in your tiny
>>>> piss-any network, when any gov. can already do so ?
>>>>
>>>> Do business with who you like, and don't with who you don't like....
>>>> it's totally your choice....
>>>>
>>>> But at the end of the day, when the Gov is involved, irrespective of
>>>> which one... you have to bring your own jar of Vaseline, and they don't
>>>> kiss in the morning !
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Faisal Imtiaz
>>>> Snappy Internet & Telecom
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> *From: *"Ken Hohhof" <[email protected]>
>>>> *To: *[email protected]
>>>> *Sent: *Sunday, March 20, 2016 2:22:11 PM
>>>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Baicells Interview
>>>>
>>>> They may be able to sell some of that here domestically, since one of
>>>> the presidential candidates suggested “closing that Internet up in some
>>>> way”.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *From:* Josh Reynolds
>>>> *Sent:* Sunday, March 20, 2016 1:00 PM
>>>> *To:* [email protected]
>>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Baicells Interview
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> You are familiar with Cisco developing products to aid in China's
>>>> internet snooping and repression, right?
>>>> On Mar 20, 2016 12:16 PM, "Ken Hohhof" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Recent article raises suspicions Huawei violated Iran sanctions.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/19/technology/zte-document-raises-questions-about-huawei-and-sanctions.html?_r=0
>>>>>
>>>>> Although expecting Chinese companies to obey our sanctions against
>>>>> Iran and not use tricks to get around them is probably unrealistic.  But
>>>>> it’s a little humorous reading how ZTE copied the tricks of an unnamed
>>>>> company that is clearly Huawei.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *From:* Mike Hammett
>>>>> *Sent:* Sunday, March 20, 2016 11:44 AM
>>>>> *To:* [email protected]
>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Baicells Interview
>>>>>
>>>>> Some of it is bull, but the blatant duplication of Cisco is
>>>>> indisputable.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> -----
>>>>> Mike Hammett
>>>>> Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/>
>>>>> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>
>>>>> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>
>>>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>
>>>>> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
>>>>> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/>
>>>>> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix>
>>>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>
>>>>> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
>>>>> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
>>>>> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>> *From: *"Josh Reynolds" <[email protected]>
>>>>> *To: *[email protected]
>>>>> *Sent: *Saturday, March 19, 2016 6:44:02 PM
>>>>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Baicells Interview
>>>>>
>>>>> Has anybody taken a look at the number of government employees China
>>>>> has by any chance? What about the number of DoD and general federal
>>>>> workforce? Do those members of the workforce - do their policies and
>>>>> beliefs fall 100% in line with things the government as a whole says or
>>>>> does?
>>>>>
>>>>> You guys realize that half the shit you've heard about Huawei was
>>>>> bullshit put for by our government who were acting as mouthpieces for 
>>>>> Cisco
>>>>> which was later RECANTED by our own government in just a few short years
>>>>> and then used in FEDERALLY FUNDED PROJECTS, right?
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm curious if maybe Google, Amazon, and Facebook have done anything
>>>>> "bad" in your eyes... Since they have direct connections to the CIA and
>>>>> NSA. They have an incredible amount of data and control.
>>>>>
>>>>> What's that, the NSA has intercepted routing and switching products
>>>>> mid shipment and modified them before sending them out? What's that, the
>>>>> NSA was caught weakening encryption protocols, the Linux kernel, and put
>>>>> backdoors in equipment from companies like Fortigate, Cisco, and Juniper -
>>>>> putting our own countries citizens and world governments at risk in the
>>>>> process?
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm not saying that Huawei is any kind of saint, or that they haven't
>>>>> done shitty things in the past - my problem is you and others are
>>>>> insinuating that every employee Huawei has ever had is some kind of 
>>>>> scumbag
>>>>> while simultaneously holding up a different mirror to our own  government
>>>>> and its employees.
>>>>>
>>>>> For fukes sake get some goddamn perspective.
>>>>> On Mar 19, 2016 6:30 PM, "Jason McKemie" <
>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I'd tend to agree, hence my concern. I'm not sure that just having
>>>>>> one of the lead people from Huawei is any connection other than the
>>>>>> obvious. This person could have had issues with the company as well, and
>>>>>> left as a result.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Saturday, March 19, 2016, Rory Conaway <[email protected]>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If there is a Huawei connection, we won’t touch it, simple as that.
>>>>>>> Huawei is both a thief and an arm of the Chinese government.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Rory
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Mathew
>>>>>>> Howard
>>>>>>> *Sent:* Saturday, March 19, 2016 4:03 PM
>>>>>>> *To:* af
>>>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Baicells Interview
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm assuming that $1/month is for some kind of cloud based EPC....
>>>>>>> you can most likely buy your own instead, but that seems to be one of 
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> more costly parts of doing LTE.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 5:38 PM, Jason McKemie <
>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Good interview.  A couple things I'm wondering / concerned about
>>>>>>> though.  First of all, what's with the $1/month/CPE?  I realize it 
>>>>>>> isn't a
>>>>>>> ton of money, just seems like an expense that shouldn't be there.  Also,
>>>>>>> I'm a little wary of the Huawei tie-in - although I haven't researched 
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> specific "fellow" that they're talking about.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 9:26 AM, Mike Hammett <[email protected]>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-5vNs0roFK4
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -----
>>>>>>> Mike Hammett
>>>>>>> Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/>
>>>>>>> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>
>>>>>>> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>
>>>>>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>
>>>>>>> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
>>>>>>> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/>
>>>>>>> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix>
>>>>>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>
>>>>>>> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
>>>>>>> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
>>>>>>> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>

Reply via email to