I'm mainly just interested in finding out more information on the guy, so far I haven't found much of anything.
On Monday, March 21, 2016, Josh Reynolds <[email protected]> wrote: > This is so fucking stupid. > > If people are that paranoid that they might have even a passing > association with Haiwei, you're probably not interested in their > products regardless of their answer because "they could be lying" :) > > It also could be they might want to use the Huawei name even in the > case of a very remote connection just because *that's the gear the > majority of the world seems to be buying at this point*, even if the > only connection is "one of the founders used to work there". > > http://www.wired.com/2008/05/leaked-cisco-do/ > "Cisco Leak: ‘Great Firewall’ of China Was a Chance to Sell More Routers" > > > http://www.cnet.com/news/lawsuit-accuses-cisco-of-aiding-chinese-repression/ > Lawsuit accuses Cisco of aiding Chinese repression > "Suit alleges Cisco designed and supplied a surveillance system to > track and sensor the activities of the Falun Gong spiritual movement." > > http://laogai.org/commentaries/cisco-and-machinery-chinese-repression > CISCO AND THE MACHINERY OF CHINESE REPRESSION > " Contrary to Cisco’s claim that they “strongly support free > expression and open communication on the Internet,” the networking > giant helped design and aggressively marketed arguably the most > oppressive censorship tool in existence. More than just restricting > access to information, technology Cisco created for the Chinese > government has been used to track dissidents who were later tortured > and imprisoned by authorities." > > > http://www.networkworld.com/article/2164353/data-center/cisco-accused-of-data-theft.html > Cisco accused of data theft > RELATED > Cisco reported to enforcement agencies by Multiven for alleged 'theft' > of data | Legal battle between Cisco and Multiven flares up with EU > antitrust complaint > "Cisco is accused of stealing thousands of proprietary and copyrighted > data files from third-party services nemesis Multiven, which filed a > complaint against the company with law enforcement authorities in the > U.S. and Switzerland." > > On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 8:48 AM, Jason McKemie > <[email protected] <javascript:;>> wrote: > > Being suspicious of a company because they have a possible association > with > > a known thief is very different from blind suspicion based on religion. > > > > > > On Monday, March 21, 2016, Faisal Imtiaz <[email protected] > <javascript:;>> wrote: > >> > >> Wow, what can I say, go get your tin foil hat... > >> > >> The next thing you will be taking a crap about is that.....Mimosa now > has > >> a team of engineers working out of Turkey...who knows what those damm > >> Moselems are putting in thier code, as part of Sharia domination of > America. > >> > >> > >> Stay fearful my friend. > >> > >> :) > >> > >> Regards > >> > >> Faisal > >> > >> Sent from Mobile Device > >> > >> > >> -------- Original message -------- > >> From: Rory Conaway > >> Date:03/21/2016 12:44 AM (GMT-05:00) > >> To: [email protected] <javascript:;> > >> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Baicells Interview > >> > >> I don’t think the question is whether or not they are a Chinese > company, I > >> think the question is whether or not Huawei is involved on some level, > >> either hardware or software. Besides the fact that they entire company > is > >> based on stolen property from day 1, the second part of the argument is > >> whether or not they are funding or delivering technology to Baicell. > Only > >> Patrick Leary can answer that. I suggest he step in to clarify this. > >> > >> > >> > >> Rory > >> > >> > >> > >> From: Af [mailto:[email protected] <javascript:;>] On Behalf Of > Faisal Imtiaz > >> Sent: Sunday, March 20, 2016 8:09 PM > >> To: [email protected] <javascript:;> > >> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Baicells Interview > >> > >> > >> > >> Gotta love these conversations... > >> > >> > >> > >> What was the original topic ? > >> > >> > >> > >> Ahhh... Baicells.... a new Mfg. of LTE Products looking to forge > entrance > >> in the WISP Market Space.... who is just starting to establish > themselves > >> in the US, and as such have recruited some of The Most Respected Folks > in > >> the Community !... Patrick, Rick, Boun.. reminds me of a Dream Team > being > >> put together..... > >> > >> > >> > >> To start throwing mud or imply any FUD, just because they are a Chinese > >> Company would be a mistake.... I took a look at the Bio of the > founders, and > >> the fact that their founder are not some corporate yo yo's looking to > make > >> some $$, but one of serious engineering backgrounds actively > participating > >> in the LTE Standards committee (Global entity).. says a lot to me... > >> > >> > >> > >> I am looking forward to some interesting and exciting times in the WISP > >> futures ahead !.... Time to grow up into serious operators ! > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> :) > >> > >> > >> > >> Best of Luck Everyone ! > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> Faisal Imtiaz > >> Snappy Internet & Telecom > >> 7266 SW 48 Street > >> Miami, FL 33155 > >> Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232 > >> > >> Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: [email protected] > >> > >> > >> > >> ________________________________ > >> > >> From: "Josh Reynolds" <[email protected] <javascript:;>> > >> To: [email protected] <javascript:;> > >> Sent: Sunday, March 20, 2016 8:18:38 PM > >> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Baicells Interview > >> > >> Ah okay. Had no idea such a thing existed. > >> > >> On Mar 20, 2016 7:16 PM, "Ken Hohhof" <[email protected] <javascript:;>> > wrote: > >> > >> WIC, NM, PA, etc. Plug in card for a modular router. > >> > >> > >> > >> From: Josh Reynolds > >> > >> Sent: Sunday, March 20, 2016 7:08 PM > >> > >> To: [email protected] <javascript:;> > >> > >> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Baicells Interview > >> > >> > >> > >> Define module? > >> > >> On Mar 20, 2016 6:56 PM, "Ken Hohhof" <[email protected] <javascript:;>> > wrote: > >> > >> I’m not sure I equate “previously owned” with “grey market”. And if > Cisco > >> had a problem with it, they didn’t have to sell you a Smartnet contract > for > >> the used gear. Pretty good actually selling a full year HW/SW > maintenance > >> contract just so you can upgrade the SW. > >> > >> > >> > >> What I won’t do is buy the “new” Cisco modules from Hong Kong that are > >> probably counterfeit. Even if they are made from the same parts in the > same > >> factory. > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> From: Bruce Robertson > >> > >> Sent: Sunday, March 20, 2016 5:23 PM > >> > >> To: [email protected] <javascript:;> > >> > >> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Baicells Interview > >> > >> > >> > >> I *never* *ever* did that........................... > >> > >> On 03/20/2016 02:17 PM, Chuck McCown wrote: > >> > >> Funny, how many of us bought the cheapest Cisco thing we could find and > >> registered it so we could get fresh software for the grey market more > >> expensive routers we deployed.... hmmm???? > >> > >> > >> > >> From: Eric Kuhnke > >> > >> Sent: Sunday, March 20, 2016 2:50 PM > >> > >> To: [email protected] <javascript:;> > >> > >> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Baicells Interview > >> > >> > >> > >> I really don't see the point of trying to prevent shipments of > >> telecom/IT/networking equipment to Iran, or punishing anybody for > selling > >> telecom/IT/networking gear to Iran: > >> > >> 1) If people in Iran really want the stuff they will simply arrange a > way > >> to buy it from Dubai. > >> > >> 2) Isn't it a good thing to ship any sort of computer/networking/ISP > gear > >> into Iran? There's a very active community of Iranians who have come up > >> with local Farsi language documents/training guides and information on > how > >> to run Tor, how to get around government internet censorship, move VPN > >> traffic through their ISPs' blackholes. Iranians want to read unfettered > >> media. The US government has a whole Farsi language division funded > from the > >> Voice of America/BBG (Broadcasting Board of Governors) that is trying to > >> reach Iranians. There are a shitload of Iranians that want to use > Facebook, > >> Whatsapp, Skype, etc. More communication with the outside world is > good. > >> > >> http://www.radiofarda.com/ > >> > >> > >> > >> On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 11:00 AM, Josh Reynolds <[email protected] > <javascript:;>> > >> wrote: > >> > >> You are familiar with Cisco developing products to aid in China's > internet > >> snooping and repression, right? > >> > >> On Mar 20, 2016 12:16 PM, "Ken Hohhof" <[email protected] <javascript:;>> > wrote: > >> > >> Recent article raises suspicions Huawei violated Iran sanctions. > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > http://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/19/technology/zte-document-raises-questions-about-huawei-and-sanctions.html?_r=0 > >> > >> > >> > >> Although expecting Chinese companies to obey our sanctions against Iran > >> and not use tricks to get around them is probably unrealistic. But > it’s a > >> little humorous reading how ZTE copied the tricks of an unnamed company > that > >> is clearly Huawei. > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> From: Mike Hammett > >> > >> Sent: Sunday, March 20, 2016 11:44 AM > >> > >> To: [email protected] <javascript:;> > >> > >> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Baicells Interview > >> > >> > >> > >> Some of it is bull, but the blatant duplication of Cisco is > indisputable. > >> > >> > >> > >> ----- > >> Mike Hammett > >> Intelligent Computing Solutions > >> > >> Midwest Internet Exchange > >> > >> The Brothers WISP > >> > >> > >> > >> ________________________________ > >> > >> From: "Josh Reynolds" <[email protected] <javascript:;>> > >> To: [email protected] <javascript:;> > >> Sent: Saturday, March 19, 2016 6:44:02 PM > >> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Baicells Interview > >> > >> Has anybody taken a look at the number of government employees China has > >> by any chance? What about the number of DoD and general federal > workforce? > >> Do those members of the workforce - do their policies and beliefs fall > 100% > >> in line with things the government as a whole says or does? > >> > >> You guys realize that half the shit you've heard about Huawei was > bullshit > >> put for by our government who were acting as mouthpieces for Cisco > which was > >> later RECANTED by our own government in just a few short years and then > used > >> in FEDERALLY FUNDED PROJECTS, right? > >> > >> I'm curious if maybe Google, Amazon, and Facebook have done anything > "bad" > >> in your eyes... Since they have direct connections to the CIA and NSA. > They > >> have an incredible amount of data and control. > >> > >> What's that, the NSA has intercepted routing and switching products mid > >> shipment and modified them before sending them out? What's that, the > NSA was > >> caught weakening encryption protocols, the Linux kernel, and put > backdoors > >> in equipment from companies like Fortigate, Cisco, and Juniper - > putting our > >> own countries citizens and world governments at risk in the process? > >> > >> I'm not saying that Huawei is any kind of saint, or that they haven't > done > >> shitty things in the past - my problem is you and others are insinuating > >> that every employee Huawei has ever had is some kind of scumbag while > >> simultaneously holding up a different mirror to our own government and > its > >> employees. > >> > >> For fukes sake get some goddamn perspective. > >> > >> On Mar 19, 2016 6:30 PM, "Jason McKemie" > >> <[email protected] <javascript:;>> wrote: > >> > >> I'd tend to agree, hence my concern. I'm not sure that just having one > of > >> the lead people from Huawei is any connection other than the obvious. > This > >> person could have had issues with the company as well, and left as a > result. > >> > >> On Saturday, March 19, 2016, Rory Conaway <[email protected] > <javascript:;>> wrote: > >> > >> If there is a Huawei connection, we won’t touch it, simple as that. > >> Huawei is both a thief and an arm of the Chinese government. > >> > >> > >> > >> Rory > >> > >> > >> > >> From: Af [mailto:[email protected] <javascript:;>] On Behalf Of > Mathew Howard > >> Sent: Saturday, March 19, 2016 4:03 PM > >> To: af > >> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Baicells Interview > >> > >> > >> > >> I'm assuming that $1/month is for some kind of cloud based EPC.... you > can > >> most likely buy your own instead, but that seems to be one of the more > >> costly parts of doing LTE. > >> > >> > >> > >> On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 5:38 PM, Jason McKemie > >> <[email protected] <javascript:;>> wrote: > >> > >> Good interview. A couple things I'm wondering / concerned about though. > >> First of all, what's with the $1/month/CPE? I realize it isn't a ton of > >> money, just seems like an expense that shouldn't be there. Also, I'm a > >> little wary of the Huawei tie-in - although I haven't researched the > >> specific "fellow" that they're talking about. > >> > >> > >> > >> On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 9:26 AM, Mike Hammett <[email protected] > <javascript:;>> wrote: > >> > >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-5vNs0roFK4 > >> > >> > >> > >> ----- > >> Mike Hammett > >> Intelligent Computing Solutions > >> > >> Midwest Internet Exchange > >> > >> The Brothers WISP > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> !DSPAM:2,56ef137a138861700012119! > >> > >> > >> > >> >
