Any can't you use a CCR1009 with a EOIP, pptp, etc setup? On Sun, Jul 3, 2016 at 3:39 PM, Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote:
> O*U*C*H > OK, need cheap too during experimentation.... (Cheap, solid, high > performance, flawless.... easy to find, right) > Will take a look at UBNT. I don’t know much about their products. > > *From:* Rory Conaway <r...@triadwireless.net> > *Sent:* Sunday, July 03, 2016 4:33 PM > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] VPN Appliance > > > The best tunneling device I’ve seen is Peplink. The catch being, you > would need the 2500 to get 1Gbps but it will go up to 2Gbps and it’s not > cheap, $15K on each side although I’m sure I could help you find a > discount. Rock solid, we have run them for months without even touching > them and years on the same firmware. > > > > To get the throughput you are looking for though, I’d consider Ubiquiti > routers. That processor handles tunneling pretty easily. > > > > Rory > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Chuck McCown > *Sent:* Sunday, July 3, 2016 3:27 PM > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] VPN Appliance > > > > Not really a firewall function. A tunneling appliance. Rock solid, low > latency, high capacity. > > > > *From:* Craig Schmaderer <cr...@skywaveconnect.com> > > *Sent:* Sunday, July 03, 2016 3:05 PM > > *To:* af@afmug.com > > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] VPN Appliance > > > > Chuck I'm not sure what exactly you want be pfsense is my favorite > firewall. Very very stable. I have it on vms dell hardware or applience > hardware rock solid for years. If you want something more name brand but > expensive i still use cisco asas all the time but price for performance can > be a lot. My friend is an engineer for F5 and they might have a solution > that would work great but might get pricey. > > Craig Schmaderer > Cell 402-380-1245 > Skywave Wireless, Inc. > > > > > > On Sat, Jul 2, 2016 at 1:13 PM -0500, "Chuck McCown" <ch...@wbmfg.com> > wrote: > > I need a box. TV headend VLAN stream goes in. 1000 Mbps. > > > > Box encapsulates it and launches it on the public internet. > > At the far end, another box reverses the situation. > > > > Years ago I used Cisco PIX for this type of thing. > > Looking over pre-baked solutions I see lots of specs about number of > users, or tunnels or sessions. > > > > I care about one single VLAN type of pipe, being wrapped up and > unwrapped. Only. > > > > But performance has to be flawless. Robust. Plenty of CPU & Memory > overhead. > > > > Recommendations? >
