A couple of x86 routers running Mikrotik L2TP between them?
bp
<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
On 7/3/2016 4:08 PM, TJ Trout wrote:
Any can't you use a CCR1009 with a EOIP, pptp, etc setup?
On Sun, Jul 3, 2016 at 3:39 PM, Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com
<mailto:ch...@wbmfg.com>> wrote:
O*U*C*H
OK, need cheap too during experimentation.... (Cheap, solid, high
performance, flawless.... easy to find, right)
Will take a look at UBNT. I don’t know much about their products.
*From:* Rory Conaway <mailto:r...@triadwireless.net>
*Sent:* Sunday, July 03, 2016 4:33 PM
*To:* af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] VPN Appliance
The best tunneling device I’ve seen is Peplink. The catch being,
you would need the 2500 to get 1Gbps but it will go up to 2Gbps
and it’s not cheap, $15K on each side although I’m sure I could
help you find a discount. Rock solid, we have run them for months
without even touching them and years on the same firmware.
To get the throughput you are looking for though, I’d consider
Ubiquiti routers. That processor handles tunneling pretty easily.
Rory
*From:*Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com
<mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com>] *On Behalf Of *Chuck McCown
*Sent:* Sunday, July 3, 2016 3:27 PM
*To:* af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] VPN Appliance
Not really a firewall function. A tunneling appliance. Rock
solid, low latency, high capacity.
*From:*Craig Schmaderer <mailto:cr...@skywaveconnect.com>
*Sent:*Sunday, July 03, 2016 3:05 PM
*To:*af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>
*Subject:*Re: [AFMUG] VPN Appliance
Chuck I'm not sure what exactly you want be pfsense is my favorite
firewall. Very very stable. I have it on vms dell hardware or
applience hardware rock solid for years. If you want something
more name brand but expensive i still use cisco asas all the time
but price for performance can be a lot. My friend is an engineer
for F5 and they might have a solution that would work great but
might get pricey.
Craig Schmaderer
Cell 402-380-1245 <tel:402-380-1245>
Skywave Wireless, Inc.
On Sat, Jul 2, 2016 at 1:13 PM -0500, "Chuck McCown"
<ch...@wbmfg.com <mailto:ch...@wbmfg.com>> wrote:
I need a box. TV headend VLAN stream goes in. 1000 Mbps.
Box encapsulates it and launches it on the public internet.
At the far end, another box reverses the situation.
Years ago I used Cisco PIX for this type of thing.
Looking over pre-baked solutions I see lots of specs about number
of users, or tunnels or sessions.
I care about one single VLAN type of pipe, being wrapped up and
unwrapped. Only.
But performance has to be flawless. Robust. Plenty of CPU &
Memory overhead.
Recommendations?
