Okay, if you need encryption, you could go with pfsense on a high clock speed modern Xeon, and get one of the support AES accelerator cards. That should do your 1Gbps encrypted for around $2500 an end. On Jul 3, 2016 8:11 PM, "Mike Hammett" <af...@ics-il.net> wrote:
> None of these are likely to provide the necessary encryption. I'm not sure > that anything less than IPSEC would be sufficient. > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/> > <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> > <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> > <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> > Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/> > <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange> > <https://twitter.com/mdwestix> > The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/> > <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp> > > > <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg> > ------------------------------ > *From: *"Bill Prince" <part15...@gmail.com> > *To: *af@afmug.com > *Sent: *Sunday, July 3, 2016 6:39:27 PM > *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] VPN Appliance > > A couple of x86 routers running Mikrotik L2TP between them? > > > bp > <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> > > > On 7/3/2016 4:08 PM, TJ Trout wrote: > > Any can't you use a CCR1009 with a EOIP, pptp, etc setup? > > On Sun, Jul 3, 2016 at 3:39 PM, Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote: > >> O*U*C*H >> OK, need cheap too during experimentation.... (Cheap, solid, high >> performance, flawless.... easy to find, right) >> Will take a look at UBNT. I don’t know much about their products. >> >> *From:* Rory Conaway <r...@triadwireless.net> >> *Sent:* Sunday, July 03, 2016 4:33 PM >> *To:* af@afmug.com >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] VPN Appliance >> >> >> The best tunneling device I’ve seen is Peplink. The catch being, you >> would need the 2500 to get 1Gbps but it will go up to 2Gbps and it’s not >> cheap, $15K on each side although I’m sure I could help you find a >> discount. Rock solid, we have run them for months without even touching >> them and years on the same firmware. >> >> >> >> To get the throughput you are looking for though, I’d consider Ubiquiti >> routers. That processor handles tunneling pretty easily. >> >> >> >> Rory >> >> >> >> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Chuck McCown >> *Sent:* Sunday, July 3, 2016 3:27 PM >> *To:* af@afmug.com >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] VPN Appliance >> >> >> >> Not really a firewall function. A tunneling appliance. Rock solid, low >> latency, high capacity. >> >> >> >> *From:* Craig Schmaderer <cr...@skywaveconnect.com> >> >> *Sent:* Sunday, July 03, 2016 3:05 PM >> >> *To:* af@afmug.com >> >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] VPN Appliance >> >> >> >> Chuck I'm not sure what exactly you want be pfsense is my favorite >> firewall. Very very stable. I have it on vms dell hardware or applience >> hardware rock solid for years. If you want something more name brand but >> expensive i still use cisco asas all the time but price for performance can >> be a lot. My friend is an engineer for F5 and they might have a solution >> that would work great but might get pricey. >> >> Craig Schmaderer >> Cell 402-380-1245 >> Skywave Wireless, Inc. >> >> >> >> >> >> On Sat, Jul 2, 2016 at 1:13 PM -0500, "Chuck McCown" < <ch...@wbmfg.com> >> ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote: >> >> I need a box. TV headend VLAN stream goes in. 1000 Mbps. >> >> >> >> Box encapsulates it and launches it on the public internet. >> >> At the far end, another box reverses the situation. >> >> >> >> Years ago I used Cisco PIX for this type of thing. >> >> Looking over pre-baked solutions I see lots of specs about number of >> users, or tunnels or sessions. >> >> >> >> I care about one single VLAN type of pipe, being wrapped up and >> unwrapped. Only. >> >> >> >> But performance has to be flawless. Robust. Plenty of CPU & Memory >> overhead. >> >> >> >> Recommendations? >> > > > >
