Village of this, Village of that. That's the legal term for most small towns in Illinois. When you think 'City of ' around here, it's usually like Aurora, Naperville, Joliet, etc. Except it's just "The City" for Chicago in podunk terms.

On 7/26/2016 7:31 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:
In Illinois I know of cities, towns and villages. There may be more that I'm forgetting.



-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/>
<https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL><https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb><https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions><https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/>
<https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix><https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange><https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
<https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>


<https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From: *"Josh Reynolds" <[email protected]>
*To: *[email protected]
*Sent: *Tuesday, July 26, 2016 7:29:57 PM
*Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] 4.9 Ghz PTP - Can I...

I had never heard the term "village" used in North America until recently. "Towns" and "cities" yes, but I was always under the assumption a "village" was a "town" in Europe.


On Jul 26, 2016 6:40 PM, "George Skorup" <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    Not for small villages with almost no budget.

    On 7/26/2016 6:29 PM, Daniel White wrote:

        I’d guess Cambium would say that the 450i platform is a better
        fit for government projects.

        Daniel White

        Managing Director – Hardware Distribution Sales

        ConVergence Technologies__

        Cell: +1 (303) 746-3590 <tel:%2B1%20%28303%29%20746-3590>

        [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>

        *From:*Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *George
        Skorup
        *Sent:* Tuesday, July 26, 2016 5:21 PM
        *To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
        *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 4.9 Ghz PTP - Can I...

        If only Cambium would let us unlock 4.9 on ePMP for the gov't
        projects we're doing.... hint hint, poke poke.

        On 7/26/2016 3:12 PM, Daniel White wrote:

            If it is under a government FRN… then there is no license
            fees.

            You can’t have the link licensed under your FRN.

            Daniel White

            Managing Director – Hardware Distribution Sales

            ConVergence Technologies

            Cell: +1 (303) 746-3590 <tel:%2B1%20%28303%29%20746-3590>

            [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>

            *From:*Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of
            *Josh Luthman
            *Sent:* Tuesday, July 26, 2016 8:57 AM
            *To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
            *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 4.9 Ghz PTP - Can I...

            >public safety agency owns the equipment they can license
            and only pay coordination costs (no FCC fees)

            So when you edit/add the site information on the FCC sites
            you don't have to pay if it's for government use?


            Josh Luthman
            Office: 937-552-2340 <tel:937-552-2340>
            Direct: 937-552-2343 <tel:937-552-2343>
            1100 Wayne St
            Suite 1337
            Troy, OH 45373

            On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 10:54 AM, Daniel White
            <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

                Adam,

                To answer your question, you cannot use 4.9GHz to
                provide internet service, regardless of whom the end
                user is. Commercial traffic cannot pass over public
                safety systems (although a 4.9GHz user can distribute
                the Internet on their internal network using 4.9GHz).

                I’d guess if the tower site was the Demarc, the safety
                agency had a contract to lease space on the tower, and
                you donated the equipment to the safety agency it
                would all be kosher.

                I’m not a fan of 4.9GHz for most applications
                personally – remember safety agencies with higher
                priority in a disaster can shut down other networks to
                prevent interference (for instance, if FEMA moves into
                an area they can tell the city to shut down).

                Personally I’d use a Part 101 band and be done with
                it.  Once again though, if the public safety agency
                owns the equipment they can license and only pay
                coordination costs (no FCC fees).  So I would lease
                the equipment to the customer as part of the broadband
                services contract.

                Daniel White

                Managing Director – Hardware Distribution Sales

                ConVergence Technologies

                Cell: +1 (303) 746-3590 <tel:%2B1%20%28303%29%20746-3590>

                [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>

                *From:*Af [mailto:[email protected]
                <mailto:[email protected]>] *On Behalf Of
                *SmarterBroadband
                *Sent:* Monday, July 25, 2016 3:53 PM
                *To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
                *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 4.9 Ghz PTP - Can I...

                Good to know, I will take a look.

                Is a county office OK to use 4.9?

                Adam

                *From:*Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of
                *Jaime Fink
                *Sent:* Monday, July 25, 2016 2:23 PM
                *To:* Jaime Solorza; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
                *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 4.9 Ghz PTP - Can I...

                B5c in 4.9 GHz is Part 90 Subpart Y certified, should
                get you 200 Mbps+ aggregate in it’s max allowable
                channel configuration in that band. Great distance for it.

                Jaime Fink • Mimosa <http://www.mimosa.co> • CPO &
                Co-Founder

                On July 25, 2016 at 2:18:33 PM, Jaime Solorza
                ([email protected]
                <mailto:[email protected]>) wrote:

                    Our county folks have Cisco 4.9Ghz radios but are
                    replacing with 3.65 GHz due to hundreds of Radwins
                    used across border by state and federal
                    agencies.   I know Airaya had some 4.9GHz ptp
                    solutions.... I know in 5GHz once they go up they
                    stay up pretty solidly.

                    On Jul 25, 2016 2:57 PM, "SmarterBroadband"
                    <[email protected]
                    <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

                    We currently provide 100 meg to our local county
                    offices on an AF24.

                    They want us to move the link to another location
                    will be a 4.3 mile link, so AF24 is out.

                    I need a link to do 100 meg now and be able to do
                    200 when requested, I want five nines, so Licensed.

                    Can I use 4.9 Ghz for this?

                    What is available for PTP in 4.9Ghz?

                    If not, I could use a B11, but I hate to waste 11
                    Ghz spectrum on a short link.

                    Suggestions in Licensed 18Ghz?

                    BTW they are price sensitive.

                    Thanks

                    Adam

                
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient&utm_term=icon>

                        

                Virus-free. www.avast.com
                
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient&utm_term=link>


            
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient&utm_term=icon>

                

            Virus-free. www.avast.com
            
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient&utm_term=link>



        
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient&utm_term=icon>
                Virus-free. www.avast.com
        
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient&utm_term=link>





Reply via email to