Keep in mind that Rory is in Arizona ! :) Faisal Imtiaz Snappy Internet & Telecom 7266 SW 48 Street Miami, FL 33155 Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232
Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: [email protected] > From: "Charles Regan" <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Tuesday, November 1, 2016 9:36:09 AM > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PTP 60 miles 400Mbps > 11ghz? How stable is that link? Signals? Screenshot? > On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 10:32 AM, Rory Conaway < [email protected] > > wrote: >> I have a 50 mile B11 link with 4’ dishes running 400Mbps. When the alignment >> is >> done, it should hit 480Mbps. >> Rory >> From: Af [mailto: [email protected] ] On Behalf Of Jeremy >> Sent: Monday, October 31, 2016 7:11 PM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PTP 60 miles 400Mbps >> If you are already using AF5X, would this be a possibility? >> On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 8:00 PM, Jaime Solorza < [email protected] > >> wrote: >> We did a link from across the bay in Corpus Cristi with Tsunami 5Ghz radios >> using 4 ft. Dishes using horizontal polarity. 5 story building on one side >> and >> 120 ft. Tower at other side. These were 10mbps radios and we got almost 100% >> across. All the other links on same roof and other water as well used >> vertical >> polarity and had ducting issues. With MIMO and all kinds of polarity options >> I >> am sure you can find a solution. Antenna diversity must be engineered for >> path >> and conditions. Where are you trying to shoot from? >> On Oct 31, 2016 6:39 PM, "Cassidy B. Larson" < [email protected] > wrote: >> Did SAF try 6GHz? Or did they only try 5GHz? >> Seems a 2+0 at 6 would probably work at that distance.. although seawater is >> a >> factor I dunno about >> On Oct 31, 2016, at 18:32, Charles Regan < [email protected] > wrote: >>> Well here's SAF response: >>> My link planning team confirmed SAF does not have a viable 5GHz radio that >>> can >>> achieve your objective for this path. >>> Trango: >>> rough calculation suggests that even using space diversity will yield a 3 - >>> 4 >>> 'nines' link (predicted reliability) at around 200Mbps FDX. The use of space >>> diversity will also add considerably to the cost (a complete link might be >>> upwards of $50K). >>> I'll ask SIAE... >>> On Oct 31, 2016 9:19 PM, "Eric Kuhnke" < [email protected] > wrote: >>> 20k? >>> SIAE AlfoPlus2 6 GHz 1024QAM dual polarity link. Or two pairs of alfoplus1 >>> 1024qam (single polarity) radios running in parallel, opposite polarities, >>> equal OSPF cost between routers. >>> Or Trango's 1024QAM 6GHz radios. >>> Why not SAF? I thought there was a 6 GHz version of the Integra now. >>> On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 5:10 PM, Charles Regan < [email protected] > >>> wrote: >>> Hello everyone, >>> What would you guys use for a 60 miles PTP link? 400Mbps. Oh and it's over >>> seawater... 20k$ budget. >>> SAF, Trango both said sorry, can't do. >>> Mimosa B5C with space diversity and 3k$ maybe. >>> We do have a working AF5x with a 34dbi dish doing 150Mbps aggregate. >>> The link gets bad sometimes because of ducting/reflection. >>> How could I use two parabolics dish on different polarity with the AF5x for >>> space diversity? Splitter? >>> Should a B5C perform better or worse ? >>> Charles
