And that the OP is shooting over seawater.
I wonder if someone has a solution to move the antennas up and down with the tides? From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Faisal Imtiaz Sent: Tuesday, November 1, 2016 9:21 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PTP 60 miles 400Mbps Keep in mind that Rory is in Arizona ! :) Faisal Imtiaz Snappy Internet & Telecom 7266 SW 48 Street Miami, FL 33155 Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232 Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> _____ From: "Charles Regan" <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, November 1, 2016 9:36:09 AM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PTP 60 miles 400Mbps 11ghz? How stable is that link? Signals? Screenshot? On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 10:32 AM, Rory Conaway <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > wrote: I have a 50 mile B11 link with 4’ dishes running 400Mbps. When the alignment is done, it should hit 480Mbps. Rory From: Af [mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ] On Behalf Of Jeremy Sent: Monday, October 31, 2016 7:11 PM To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PTP 60 miles 400Mbps If you are already using AF5X, would this be a possibility? On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 8:00 PM, Jaime Solorza <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > wrote: We did a link from across the bay in Corpus Cristi with Tsunami 5Ghz radios using 4 ft. Dishes using horizontal polarity. 5 story building on one side and 120 ft. Tower at other side. These were 10mbps radios and we got almost 100% across. All the other links on same roof and other water as well used vertical polarity and had ducting issues. With MIMO and all kinds of polarity options I am sure you can find a solution. Antenna diversity must be engineered for path and conditions. Where are you trying to shoot from? On Oct 31, 2016 6:39 PM, "Cassidy B. Larson" <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > wrote: Did SAF try 6GHz? Or did they only try 5GHz? Seems a 2+0 at 6 would probably work at that distance.. although seawater is a factor I dunno about On Oct 31, 2016, at 18:32, Charles Regan <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > wrote: Well here's SAF response: My link planning team confirmed SAF does not have a viable 5GHz radio that can achieve your objective for this path. Trango: rough calculation suggests that even using space diversity will yield a 3 - 4 'nines' link (predicted reliability) at around 200Mbps FDX. The use of space diversity will also add considerably to the cost (a complete link might be upwards of $50K). I'll ask SIAE... On Oct 31, 2016 9:19 PM, "Eric Kuhnke" <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > wrote: 20k? SIAE AlfoPlus2 6 GHz 1024QAM dual polarity link. Or two pairs of alfoplus1 1024qam (single polarity) radios running in parallel, opposite polarities, equal OSPF cost between routers. Or Trango's 1024QAM 6GHz radios. Why not SAF? I thought there was a 6 GHz version of the Integra now. On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 5:10 PM, Charles Regan <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > wrote: Hello everyone, What would you guys use for a 60 miles PTP link? 400Mbps. Oh and it's over seawater... 20k$ budget. SAF, Trango both said sorry, can't do. Mimosa B5C with space diversity and 3k$ maybe. We do have a working AF5x with a 34dbi dish doing 150Mbps aggregate. The link gets bad sometimes because of ducting/reflection. How could I use two parabolics dish on different polarity with the AF5x for space diversity? Splitter? Should a B5C perform better or worse ? Charles
