Chuck McCown  is too old to adopt anything that is “in”

From: Ken Hohhof 
Sent: Friday, November 18, 2016 11:34 AM
To: af@afmug.com 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Streaming video to 50 simultaneous users

Royal we is out, referring to yourself in the third person is in.  Preferably 
beginning with @.

 

As in @chuckmccown is not amused.

 

 

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of ch...@wbmfg.com
Sent: Friday, November 18, 2016 12:16 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Streaming video to 50 simultaneous users

 

The royal “we”...

 

From: Josh Luthman 

Sent: Friday, November 18, 2016 11:07 AM

To: af@afmug.com 

Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Streaming video to 50 simultaneous users

 

What do you mean "we"

 

 

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

 

On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 12:48 PM, <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote:

  Sorry Ray, we are a tough crowd at times!

   

  From: Chris Wright 

  Sent: Friday, November 18, 2016 10:14 AM

  To: af@afmug.com 

  Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Streaming video to 50 simultaneous users

   

  Multicast probably isn’t even necessary to justify this, judging by what 
appears to be the default resolution of the test video. Let’s be generous with 
our assumptions and assume these laptops are 1920x1080 native resolution. Given 
this assumption, we can infer that the test video’s resolution about ½ of this, 
based on the attached screenshot of the video. So we have a 960x540 resolution 
video to playback. What of bitrate? Let’s be generous again and give it 
1800kbps for video, 192kbps for audio, totaling to a hair under 2mbps per 
stream (real-world for this resolution encoded in h.264 you can expect about 
1200-1400kbps to work beautifully.)

   

  So now things are starting to seem less groundbreaking – this is a 2mbps test 
video being streamed to 50 clients in the same room, with perfect or 
near-perfect line of sight to each. Total aggregate traffic is 100mbps on N/AC. 

   

  I’m far too jaded by whitepapers, so I’ll keep to this assumption until 
Cambium gives us real numbers.

   

  Chris Wright

  Network Administrator

   

  From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of ch...@wbmfg.com
  Sent: Friday, November 18, 2016 8:00 AM
  To: af@afmug.com
  Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Streaming video to 50 simultaneous users

   

  I was not thinking multicast.  Do you think this is multicast?

   

  From: Josh Reynolds 

  Sent: Friday, November 18, 2016 8:58 AM

  To: af@afmug.com 

  Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Streaming video to 50 simultaneous users

   

  Not watching the video, but doing this with multicast is easy. 50 different 
7-25Mbps streams would be much more difficult.

   

  On Nov 18, 2016 9:36 AM, <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote:

  I would be interested in seeing the same video showing them streaming 50 
football games at the same time.  Animations compress pretty tight.

   

  From: Ray Savich 

  Sent: Friday, November 18, 2016 8:18 AM

  To: 'af@afmug.com' 

  Subject: [AFMUG] Streaming video to 50 simultaneous users

   

  cnPilot WiFi E400 indoor and E500 outdoor solutions demonstrate simultaneous 
video streaming to 50 clients. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SfP2D019JYw 

   

  Join the Conversation

  Cambium Networks Community Forum

   

 

Reply via email to