/slap Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373
On Nov 18, 2016 1:57 PM, "Ken Hohhof" <[email protected]> wrote: > You may continue to use the royal “we” since you are a Prince. > > > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Bill Prince > *Sent:* Friday, November 18, 2016 12:38 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Streaming video to 50 simultaneous users > > > > and neither is @[email protected] > > bp > > <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> > > > > On 11/18/2016 10:34 AM, Ken Hohhof wrote: > > Royal we is out, referring to yourself in the third person is in. > Preferably beginning with @. > > > > As in @chuckmccown is not amused. > > > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On > Behalf Of *[email protected] > *Sent:* Friday, November 18, 2016 12:16 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Streaming video to 50 simultaneous users > > > > The royal “we”... > > > > *From:* Josh Luthman > > *Sent:* Friday, November 18, 2016 11:07 AM > > *To:* [email protected] > > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Streaming video to 50 simultaneous users > > > > What do you mean "we" > > > > > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > > > > On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 12:48 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > > Sorry Ray, we are a tough crowd at times! > > > > *From:* Chris Wright > > *Sent:* Friday, November 18, 2016 10:14 AM > > *To:* [email protected] > > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Streaming video to 50 simultaneous users > > > > Multicast probably isn’t even necessary to justify this, judging by what > appears to be the default resolution of the test video. Let’s be generous > with our assumptions and assume these laptops are 1920x1080 native > resolution. Given this assumption, we can infer that the test video’s > resolution about ½ of this, based on the attached screenshot of the video. > So we have a 960x540 resolution video to playback. What of bitrate? Let’s > be generous again and give it 1800kbps for video, 192kbps for audio, > totaling to a hair under 2mbps per stream (real-world for this resolution > encoded in h.264 you can expect about 1200-1400kbps to work beautifully.) > > > > So now things are starting to seem less groundbreaking – this is a 2mbps > test video being streamed to 50 clients in the same room, with perfect or > near-perfect line of sight to each. Total aggregate traffic is 100mbps on > N/AC. > > > > I’m far too jaded by whitepapers, so I’ll keep to this assumption until > Cambium gives us real numbers. > > > > Chris Wright > > Network Administrator > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On > Behalf Of *[email protected] > *Sent:* Friday, November 18, 2016 8:00 AM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Streaming video to 50 simultaneous users > > > > I was not thinking multicast. Do you think this is multicast? > > > > *From:* Josh Reynolds > > *Sent:* Friday, November 18, 2016 8:58 AM > > *To:* [email protected] > > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Streaming video to 50 simultaneous users > > > > Not watching the video, but doing this with multicast is easy. 50 > different 7-25Mbps streams would be much more difficult. > > > > On Nov 18, 2016 9:36 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > > I would be interested in seeing the same video showing them streaming 50 > football games at the same time. Animations compress pretty tight. > > > > *From:* Ray Savich > > *Sent:* Friday, November 18, 2016 8:18 AM > > *To:* '[email protected]' > > *Subject:* [AFMUG] Streaming video to 50 simultaneous users > > > > cnPilot WiFi E400 indoor and E500 outdoor solutions demonstrate > simultaneous video streaming to 50 clients. https://www.youtube. > com/watch?v=SfP2D019JYw > > > > Join the Conversation > > Cambium Networks Community Forum <http://community.cambiumnetworks.com/> > > > > > > >
