You may continue to use the royal “we” since you are a Prince.
From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Bill Prince Sent: Friday, November 18, 2016 12:38 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Streaming video to 50 simultaneous users and neither is @[email protected] bp <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> On 11/18/2016 10:34 AM, Ken Hohhof wrote: Royal we is out, referring to yourself in the third person is in. Preferably beginning with @. As in @chuckmccown is not amused. From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> Sent: Friday, November 18, 2016 12:16 PM To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Streaming video to 50 simultaneous users The royal “we”... From: Josh Luthman Sent: Friday, November 18, 2016 11:07 AM To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Streaming video to 50 simultaneous users What do you mean "we" Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 12:48 PM, <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > wrote: Sorry Ray, we are a tough crowd at times! From: Chris Wright Sent: Friday, November 18, 2016 10:14 AM To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Streaming video to 50 simultaneous users Multicast probably isn’t even necessary to justify this, judging by what appears to be the default resolution of the test video. Let’s be generous with our assumptions and assume these laptops are 1920x1080 native resolution. Given this assumption, we can infer that the test video’s resolution about ½ of this, based on the attached screenshot of the video. So we have a 960x540 resolution video to playback. What of bitrate? Let’s be generous again and give it 1800kbps for video, 192kbps for audio, totaling to a hair under 2mbps per stream (real-world for this resolution encoded in h.264 you can expect about 1200-1400kbps to work beautifully.) So now things are starting to seem less groundbreaking – this is a 2mbps test video being streamed to 50 clients in the same room, with perfect or near-perfect line of sight to each. Total aggregate traffic is 100mbps on N/AC. I’m far too jaded by whitepapers, so I’ll keep to this assumption until Cambium gives us real numbers. Chris Wright Network Administrator From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> Sent: Friday, November 18, 2016 8:00 AM To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Streaming video to 50 simultaneous users I was not thinking multicast. Do you think this is multicast? From: Josh Reynolds Sent: Friday, November 18, 2016 8:58 AM To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Streaming video to 50 simultaneous users Not watching the video, but doing this with multicast is easy. 50 different 7-25Mbps streams would be much more difficult. On Nov 18, 2016 9:36 AM, <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > wrote: I would be interested in seeing the same video showing them streaming 50 football games at the same time. Animations compress pretty tight. From: Ray Savich Sent: Friday, November 18, 2016 8:18 AM To: '[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ' Subject: [AFMUG] Streaming video to 50 simultaneous users cnPilot WiFi E400 indoor and E500 outdoor solutions demonstrate simultaneous video streaming to 50 clients. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SfP2D019JYw Join the Conversation <http://community.cambiumnetworks.com/> Cambium Networks Community Forum
