Not just a prince, but I am, in fact, Prince William.
I write that on all my legal documents.
bp
<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
On 11/18/2016 10:57 AM, Ken Hohhof wrote:
You may continue to use the royal “we” since you are a Prince.
*From:*Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Bill Prince
*Sent:* Friday, November 18, 2016 12:38 PM
*To:* [email protected]
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Streaming video to 50 simultaneous users
and neither is @[email protected]
bp
<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
On 11/18/2016 10:34 AM, Ken Hohhof wrote:
Royal we is out, referring to yourself in the third person is in.
Preferably beginning with @.
As in @chuckmccown is not amused.
*From:*Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of
*[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
*Sent:* Friday, November 18, 2016 12:16 PM
*To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Streaming video to 50 simultaneous users
The royal “we”...
*From:*Josh Luthman
*Sent:*Friday, November 18, 2016 11:07 AM
*To:*[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
*Subject:*Re: [AFMUG] Streaming video to 50 simultaneous users
What do you mean "we"
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 12:48 PM, <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Sorry Ray, we are a tough crowd at times!
*From:*Chris Wright
*Sent:*Friday, November 18, 2016 10:14 AM
*To:*[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
*Subject:*Re: [AFMUG] Streaming video to 50 simultaneous users
Multicast probably isn’t even necessary to justify this,
judging by what appears to be the default resolution of the
test video. Let’s be generous with our assumptions and assume
these laptops are 1920x1080 native resolution. Given this
assumption, we can infer that the test video’s resolution
about ½ of this, based on the attached screenshot of the
video. So we have a 960x540 resolution video to playback. What
of bitrate? Let’s be generous again and give it 1800kbps for
video, 192kbps for audio, totaling to a hair under 2mbps per
stream (real-world for this resolution encoded in h.264 you
can expect about 1200-1400kbps to work beautifully.)
So now things are starting to seem less groundbreaking – this
is a 2mbps test video being streamed to 50 clients in the same
room, with perfect or near-perfect line of sight to each.
Total aggregate traffic is 100mbps on N/AC.
I’m far too jaded by whitepapers, so I’ll keep to this
assumption until Cambium gives us real numbers.
Chris Wright
Network Administrator
*From:*Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of
*[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
*Sent:* Friday, November 18, 2016 8:00 AM
*To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Streaming video to 50 simultaneous users
I was not thinking multicast. Do you think this is multicast?
*From:*Josh Reynolds
*Sent:*Friday, November 18, 2016 8:58 AM
*To:*[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
*Subject:*Re: [AFMUG] Streaming video to 50 simultaneous users
Not watching the video, but doing this with multicast is easy.
50 different 7-25Mbps streams would be much more difficult.
On Nov 18, 2016 9:36 AM, <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
I would be interested in seeing the same video showing them
streaming 50 football games at the same time. Animations
compress pretty tight.
*From:*Ray Savich
*Sent:*Friday, November 18, 2016 8:18 AM
*To:*'[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>'
*Subject:*[AFMUG] Streaming video to 50 simultaneous users
cnPilot WiFi E400 indoor and E500 outdoor solutions
demonstrate simultaneous video streaming to 50
clients.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SfP2D019JYw
Join the Conversation
Cambium Networks Community Forum
<http://community.cambiumnetworks.com/>
