and neither is @part15...@gmail.com
bp
<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
On 11/18/2016 10:34 AM, Ken Hohhof wrote:
Royal we is out, referring to yourself in the third person is in.
Preferably beginning with @.
As in @chuckmccown is not amused.
*From:*Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *ch...@wbmfg.com
*Sent:* Friday, November 18, 2016 12:16 PM
*To:* af@afmug.com
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Streaming video to 50 simultaneous users
The royal “we”...
*From:*Josh Luthman
*Sent:*Friday, November 18, 2016 11:07 AM
*To:*af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>
*Subject:*Re: [AFMUG] Streaming video to 50 simultaneous users
What do you mean "we"
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 12:48 PM, <ch...@wbmfg.com
<mailto:ch...@wbmfg.com>> wrote:
Sorry Ray, we are a tough crowd at times!
*From:*Chris Wright
*Sent:*Friday, November 18, 2016 10:14 AM
*To:*af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>
*Subject:*Re: [AFMUG] Streaming video to 50 simultaneous users
Multicast probably isn’t even necessary to justify this, judging
by what appears to be the default resolution of the test video.
Let’s be generous with our assumptions and assume these laptops
are 1920x1080 native resolution. Given this assumption, we can
infer that the test video’s resolution about ½ of this, based on
the attached screenshot of the video. So we have a 960x540
resolution video to playback. What of bitrate? Let’s be generous
again and give it 1800kbps for video, 192kbps for audio, totaling
to a hair under 2mbps per stream (real-world for this resolution
encoded in h.264 you can expect about 1200-1400kbps to work
beautifully.)
So now things are starting to seem less groundbreaking – this is a
2mbps test video being streamed to 50 clients in the same room,
with perfect or near-perfect line of sight to each. Total
aggregate traffic is 100mbps on N/AC.
I’m far too jaded by whitepapers, so I’ll keep to this assumption
until Cambium gives us real numbers.
Chris Wright
Network Administrator
*From:*Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of
*ch...@wbmfg.com <mailto:ch...@wbmfg.com>
*Sent:* Friday, November 18, 2016 8:00 AM
*To:* af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Streaming video to 50 simultaneous users
I was not thinking multicast. Do you think this is multicast?
*From:*Josh Reynolds
*Sent:*Friday, November 18, 2016 8:58 AM
*To:*af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>
*Subject:*Re: [AFMUG] Streaming video to 50 simultaneous users
Not watching the video, but doing this with multicast is easy. 50
different 7-25Mbps streams would be much more difficult.
On Nov 18, 2016 9:36 AM, <ch...@wbmfg.com
<mailto:ch...@wbmfg.com>> wrote:
I would be interested in seeing the same video showing them
streaming 50 football games at the same time. Animations compress
pretty tight.
*From:*Ray Savich
*Sent:*Friday, November 18, 2016 8:18 AM
*To:*'af@afmug.com'
*Subject:*[AFMUG] Streaming video to 50 simultaneous users
cnPilot WiFi E400 indoor and E500 outdoor solutions demonstrate
simultaneous video streaming to 50
clients.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SfP2D019JYw
Join the Conversation
Cambium Networks Community Forum
<http://community.cambiumnetworks.com/>
