That's a very interesting point. I don't think their margins are that low though. They've done what, 40mil units sold? I think that was the last number I heard.
On Nov 30, 2016 10:27 AM, "Kurt Fankhauser" <[email protected]> wrote: > If Ubiquitis margins were low then Cambium could very well end up making > more money on a radio that Ubiquiti engineered, manufactures, and > delivered. Lol > > On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 11:24 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> This is capitalism in its finest form. Cambium just upped the bar >> substantially. The market had a very serious issue, and they solved it, >> while still generating substantial revenue. Im curious what their profit >> per hardware unit sold is compared to the profit per license, with no real >> liability. Hopefully this will force ubnt to really focus efforts on real >> sync that actually works and get an actual legitimate support channel. Or >> even better, sell their radios preloaded with the EPMP load and work out a >> discount for AP licenses through them for their customers. Mikrotik I >> assume is just saying "meh, our products are good" >> >> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 10:10 AM, Kurt Fankhauser < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> This is pretty neat with the whole Mikrotik thing, basically you can run >>> a Mikrotik CPE network and be GPS synchronized then... >>> >>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 11:08 AM, Jason Wilson < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> ePMP Elevate Compatibility >>>> >>>> check the Release Notes for complete details >>>> >>>> - Loco M5 XW >>>> - Loco M5 XM >>>> - NanoStation M5 XW >>>> - NanoStation M5 XM >>>> - NanoBridge M5 XM >>>> - Rocket M5 XM >>>> - Rocket M5 XW >>>> - Powerbeam M5 XW >>>> - Airgrid M5HP XW >>>> - Airgrid M5 XM >>>> - NanoBeam M5 XW >>>> >>>> ePMP Elevate DevelopmentsRELEASE 1.0 - NOW AVAILABLE >>>> >>>> - XM + XW model >>>> - Rocket M5 support as a SM - Dec 28, 2016 >>>> >>>> RELEASE 2.0 - END OF Q1 2017 >>>> >>>> - MikroTik Support - Alpha engagement in Q4, 2016 >>>> - RB911G5HPnDQRT >>>> - RBSXT5nDr2 >>>> - RB912UAG5HPnDOT >>>> >>>> 2.4 XW + XM MODELS - END OF Q1, 2017DELIBERANT SUPPORT - Q2, 2017 >>>> >>>> >>>> Jason Wilson >>>> Remotely Located >>>> Providing High Speed Internet to out of the way places. >>>> 530-651-1736 <(530)%20651-1736> >>>> 530-748-9608 <(530)%20748-9608> Cell >>>> www.remotelylocated.com >>>> >>>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 8:06 AM, Stefan Englhardt <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Does this work for 11ac Mikrotiks ;-)) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> *Von:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *Im Auftrag von *Jason Wilson >>>>> *Gesendet:* Mittwoch, 30. November 2016 17:03 >>>>> *An:* [email protected] >>>>> *Betreff:* Re: [AFMUG] Nicely done, Cambium! >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I tuned in to the last half of the webinar, Mikrotik is down the road, >>>>> BUT is in the works. From a 100% Mikrotik network that is a time/cash >>>>> saver. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Jason Wilson >>>>> >>>>> Remotely Located >>>>> >>>>> Providing High Speed Internet to out of the way places. >>>>> >>>>> 530-651-1736 <(530)%20651-1736> >>>>> >>>>> 530-748-9608 <(530)%20748-9608> Cell >>>>> >>>>> www.remotelylocated.com >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 7:35 AM, Jason Wilson < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Mikrotik? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Nov 30, 2016 7:31 AM, "That One Guy /sarcasm" < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> we have been installing epmp SMs to ubnt backhauls on small sites by >>>>> shutting off airmax until we get a chance to get EPMP APs at the site, >>>>> this >>>>> might give us a better window >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 9:28 AM, Adam Moffett <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Compatible doesn't mean "same". Software for an Intel 386 is >>>>> compatible with an Intel Core isn't it? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Point taken though...ePMP is still 802.11n. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ------ Original Message ------ >>>>> >>>>> From: "Stefan Englhardt" <[email protected]> >>>>> >>>>> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >>>>> >>>>> Sent: 11/30/2016 10:25:23 AM >>>>> >>>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Nicely done, Cambium! >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> They found out that their new ePMP CPEs use the same hardware as the >>>>> oldest UBNT-Atheros-Crap. So no porting problem. Just install the same SW. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> *Von:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *Im Auftrag von *That One Guy >>>>> /sarcasm >>>>> *Gesendet:* Mittwoch, 30. November 2016 16:12 >>>>> *An:* [email protected] >>>>> *Betreff:* Re: [AFMUG] Nicely done, Cambium! >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> you have to wonder if at some point cambium hired marsellus wallace >>>>> and some hard, pipe-hittin' people, who'll go to work on the ubnt >>>>> managers here with a pair of pliers and a blow torch to get hardware >>>>> access >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 9:05 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> im in the webinar, I didnt realize thats what the webinar was when I >>>>> signed up for it but now im all giddy like a school girl >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 8:55 AM, Joe Novak <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I prefer the Cambium direct link: http://www.cambiumnetwor >>>>> ks.com/blog/dont-migrate---elevate/ >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Very interesting indeed... very interesting. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 8:50 AM, Tyler Treat < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> This ought to shake things up a bit. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20161130005468/en/ >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> <http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20161130005468/en/> >>>>> >>>>> / <http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20161130005468/en/> >>>>> >>>>> www.businesswire.com >>>>> >>>>> / >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> >>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your >>>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> >>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your >>>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> >>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your >>>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team >> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >> > >
