Pretty sure that's done in hardware, and thus not possible.

On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 10:35 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm <
[email protected]> wrote:

> so I have a technical question. The m365 gear is ssupposed to be
> downconverted 5ghz, is that a software downconvert? (FCC ID issues aside)
> If thats the case could this be loaded onto m365 to turn it into epmp 5ghz?
> I assume the downconvert is more than a software load, but man, I literally
> would make a very inappropriate mess if I could dump the ubnt 3ghz network
> into epmp in one move
>
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 10:30 AM, Adam Moffett <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> 25% is what I remember.
>>
>>
>> ------ Original Message ------
>> From: "Josh Reynolds" <[email protected]>
>> To: [email protected]
>> Sent: 11/30/2016 11:29:32 AM
>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Nicely done, Cambium!
>>
>> That's a very interesting point. I don't think their margins are that low
>> though. They've done what, 40mil units sold? I think that was the last
>> number I heard.
>>
>> On Nov 30, 2016 10:27 AM, "Kurt Fankhauser" <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> If Ubiquitis margins were low then Cambium could very well end up making
>>> more money on a radio that Ubiquiti engineered, manufactures, and
>>> delivered. Lol
>>>
>>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 11:24 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> This is capitalism in its finest form. Cambium just upped the bar
>>>> substantially. The market had a very serious issue, and they solved it,
>>>> while still generating substantial revenue. Im curious what their profit
>>>> per hardware unit sold is compared to the profit per license, with no real
>>>> liability. Hopefully this will force ubnt to really focus efforts on real
>>>> sync that actually works and get an actual legitimate support channel. Or
>>>> even better, sell their radios preloaded with the EPMP load and work out a
>>>> discount for AP licenses through them for their customers. Mikrotik I
>>>> assume is just saying "meh, our products are good"
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 10:10 AM, Kurt Fankhauser <
>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> This is pretty neat with the whole Mikrotik thing, basically you can
>>>>> run a Mikrotik CPE network and be GPS synchronized then...
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 11:08 AM, Jason Wilson <
>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> ePMP Elevate Compatibility
>>>>>>
>>>>>> check the Release Notes for complete details
>>>>>>
>>>>>>    - Loco M5 XW
>>>>>>    - Loco M5 XM
>>>>>>    - NanoStation M5 XW
>>>>>>    - NanoStation M5 XM
>>>>>>    - NanoBridge M5 XM
>>>>>>    - Rocket M5 XM
>>>>>>    - Rocket M5 XW
>>>>>>    - Powerbeam M5 XW
>>>>>>    - Airgrid M5HP XW
>>>>>>    - Airgrid M5 XM
>>>>>>    - NanoBeam M5 XW
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ePMP Elevate DevelopmentsRELEASE 1.0 - NOW AVAILABLE
>>>>>>
>>>>>>    - XM + XW model
>>>>>>    - Rocket M5 support as a SM - Dec 28, 2016
>>>>>>
>>>>>> RELEASE 2.0 - END OF Q1 2017
>>>>>>
>>>>>>    - MikroTik Support - Alpha engagement in Q4, 2016
>>>>>>    - RB911G5HPnDQRT
>>>>>>    - RBSXT5nDr2
>>>>>>    - RB912UAG5HPnDOT
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2.4 XW + XM MODELS - END OF Q1, 2017DELIBERANT SUPPORT - Q2, 2017
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Jason Wilson
>>>>>> Remotely Located
>>>>>> Providing High Speed Internet to out of the way places.
>>>>>> 530-651-1736 <(530)%20651-1736>
>>>>>> 530-748-9608 <(530)%20748-9608> Cell
>>>>>> www.remotelylocated.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 8:06 AM, Stefan Englhardt <[email protected]>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Does this work for 11ac Mikrotiks ;-))
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> *Von:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *Im Auftrag von *Jason
>>>>>>> Wilson
>>>>>>> *Gesendet:* Mittwoch, 30. November 2016 17:03
>>>>>>> *An:* [email protected]
>>>>>>> *Betreff:* Re: [AFMUG] Nicely done, Cambium!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I tuned in to the last half of the webinar, Mikrotik is down the
>>>>>>> road, BUT is in the works.  From a 100% Mikrotik network that is a
>>>>>>> time/cash saver.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Jason Wilson
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Remotely Located
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Providing High Speed Internet to out of the way places.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 530-651-1736 <(530)%20651-1736>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 530-748-9608 <(530)%20748-9608> Cell
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> www.remotelylocated.com
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 7:35 AM, Jason Wilson <
>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Mikrotik?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Nov 30, 2016 7:31 AM, "That One Guy /sarcasm" <
>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> we have been installing epmp SMs to ubnt backhauls on small sites by
>>>>>>> shutting off airmax until we get a chance to get EPMP APs at the site, 
>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>> might give us a better window
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 9:28 AM, Adam Moffett <[email protected]>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Compatible doesn't mean "same".  Software for an Intel 386 is
>>>>>>> compatible with an Intel Core isn't it?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Point taken though...ePMP is still 802.11n.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ------ Original Message ------
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> From: "Stefan Englhardt" <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sent: 11/30/2016 10:25:23 AM
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Nicely done, Cambium!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> They found out that their new ePMP CPEs use the same hardware as the
>>>>>>> oldest UBNT-Atheros-Crap. So no porting problem. Just install the same 
>>>>>>> SW.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> *Von:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *Im Auftrag von *That One
>>>>>>> Guy /sarcasm
>>>>>>> *Gesendet:* Mittwoch, 30. November 2016 16:12
>>>>>>> *An:* [email protected]
>>>>>>> *Betreff:* Re: [AFMUG] Nicely done, Cambium!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> you have to wonder if at some point cambium hired marsellus wallace
>>>>>>>  and some hard, pipe-hittin' people, who'll go to work on the ubnt
>>>>>>> managers here with a pair of pliers and a blow torch to get hardware 
>>>>>>> access
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 9:05 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm <
>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> im in the webinar, I didnt realize thats what the webinar was when I
>>>>>>> signed up for it but now im all giddy like a school girl
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 8:55 AM, Joe Novak <[email protected]>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I prefer the Cambium direct link: http://www.cambiumnetwor
>>>>>>> ks.com/blog/dont-migrate---elevate/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Very interesting indeed... very interesting.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 8:50 AM, Tyler Treat <
>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This ought to shake things up a bit.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20161130005468/en/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> <http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20161130005468/en/>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> / <http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20161130005468/en/>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> www.businesswire.com
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> /
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your
>>>>>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your
>>>>>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your
>>>>>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your
>>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>
> --
> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team
> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
>

Reply via email to