Lot of this stuff uses direct conversion these days. So that would just require a front end filter change and a local oscillator capable of hitting the right freqs (for the receiver).
TX filters would have to change. From: Ken Hohhof Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2016 9:56 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Nicely done, Cambium! And a transverter or heterodyne circuit or whatever the right name is. Not sure if they use somebody’s SOC for that, or build it out of discrete parts. Need local oscillator, mixer, and filter to select the wanted sum or difference and reject the unwanted one. Or perhaps they do dual conversion via some intermediate frequency. As opposed to AF3x which is natively 3 GHz because it is not built on a general purpose WiFi chip. From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Bill Prince Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2016 10:42 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Nicely done, Cambium! There are probably hardware filters on the RF side. bp<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> On 11/30/2016 8:35 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm wrote: so I have a technical question. The m365 gear is ssupposed to be downconverted 5ghz, is that a software downconvert? (FCC ID issues aside) If thats the case could this be loaded onto m365 to turn it into epmp 5ghz? I assume the downconvert is more than a software load, but man, I literally would make a very inappropriate mess if I could dump the ubnt 3ghz network into epmp in one move On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 10:30 AM, Adam Moffett <[email protected]> wrote: 25% is what I remember. ------ Original Message ------ From: "Josh Reynolds" <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: 11/30/2016 11:29:32 AM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Nicely done, Cambium! That's a very interesting point. I don't think their margins are that low though. They've done what, 40mil units sold? I think that was the last number I heard. On Nov 30, 2016 10:27 AM, "Kurt Fankhauser" <[email protected]> wrote: If Ubiquitis margins were low then Cambium could very well end up making more money on a radio that Ubiquiti engineered, manufactures, and delivered. Lol On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 11:24 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm <[email protected]> wrote: This is capitalism in its finest form. Cambium just upped the bar substantially. The market had a very serious issue, and they solved it, while still generating substantial revenue. Im curious what their profit per hardware unit sold is compared to the profit per license, with no real liability. Hopefully this will force ubnt to really focus efforts on real sync that actually works and get an actual legitimate support channel. Or even better, sell their radios preloaded with the EPMP load and work out a discount for AP licenses through them for their customers. Mikrotik I assume is just saying "meh, our products are good" On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 10:10 AM, Kurt Fankhauser <[email protected]> wrote: This is pretty neat with the whole Mikrotik thing, basically you can run a Mikrotik CPE network and be GPS synchronized then... On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 11:08 AM, Jason Wilson <[email protected]> wrote: ePMP Elevate Compatibility check the Release Notes for complete details a.. Loco M5 XW b.. Loco M5 XM c.. NanoStation M5 XW d.. NanoStation M5 XM e.. NanoBridge M5 XM f.. Rocket M5 XM g.. Rocket M5 XW h.. Powerbeam M5 XW i.. Airgrid M5HP XW j.. Airgrid M5 XM k.. NanoBeam M5 XW ePMP Elevate Developments RELEASE 1.0 - NOW AVAILABLE a.. XM + XW model b.. Rocket M5 support as a SM - Dec 28, 2016 RELEASE 2.0 - END OF Q1 2017 a.. MikroTik Support - Alpha engagement in Q4, 2016 b.. RB911G5HPnDQRT c.. RBSXT5nDr2 d.. RB912UAG5HPnDOT 2.4 XW + XM MODELS - END OF Q1, 2017 DELIBERANT SUPPORT - Q2, 2017 Jason Wilson Remotely Located Providing High Speed Internet to out of the way places. 530-651-1736 530-748-9608 Cell www.remotelylocated.com On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 8:06 AM, Stefan Englhardt <[email protected]> wrote: Does this work for 11ac Mikrotiks ;-)) Von: Af [mailto:[email protected]] Im Auftrag von Jason Wilson Gesendet: Mittwoch, 30. November 2016 17:03 An: [email protected] Betreff: Re: [AFMUG] Nicely done, Cambium! I tuned in to the last half of the webinar, Mikrotik is down the road, BUT is in the works. From a 100% Mikrotik network that is a time/cash saver. Jason Wilson Remotely Located Providing High Speed Internet to out of the way places. 530-651-1736 530-748-9608 Cell www.remotelylocated.com On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 7:35 AM, Jason Wilson <[email protected]> wrote: Mikrotik? On Nov 30, 2016 7:31 AM, "That One Guy /sarcasm" <[email protected]> wrote: we have been installing epmp SMs to ubnt backhauls on small sites by shutting off airmax until we get a chance to get EPMP APs at the site, this might give us a better window On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 9:28 AM, Adam Moffett <[email protected]> wrote: Compatible doesn't mean "same". Software for an Intel 386 is compatible with an Intel Core isn't it? Point taken though...ePMP is still 802.11n. ------ Original Message ------ From: "Stefan Englhardt" <[email protected]> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Sent: 11/30/2016 10:25:23 AM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Nicely done, Cambium! They found out that their new ePMP CPEs use the same hardware as the oldest UBNT-Atheros-Crap. So no porting problem. Just install the same SW. Von: Af [mailto:[email protected]] Im Auftrag von That One Guy /sarcasm Gesendet: Mittwoch, 30. November 2016 16:12 An: [email protected] Betreff: Re: [AFMUG] Nicely done, Cambium! you have to wonder if at some point cambium hired marsellus wallace and some hard, pipe-hittin' people, who'll go to work on the ubnt managers here with a pair of pliers and a blow torch to get hardware access On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 9:05 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm <[email protected]> wrote: im in the webinar, I didnt realize thats what the webinar was when I signed up for it but now im all giddy like a school girl On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 8:55 AM, Joe Novak <[email protected]> wrote: I prefer the Cambium direct link: http://www.cambiumnetworks.com/blog/dont-migrate---elevate/ Very interesting indeed... very interesting. On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 8:50 AM, Tyler Treat <[email protected]> wrote: This ought to shake things up a bit. http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20161130005468/en/ / www.businesswire.com / -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
