This is pretty neat with the whole Mikrotik thing, basically you can run a Mikrotik CPE network and be GPS synchronized then...
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 11:08 AM, Jason Wilson <[email protected]> wrote: > ePMP Elevate Compatibility > > check the Release Notes for complete details > > - Loco M5 XW > - Loco M5 XM > - NanoStation M5 XW > - NanoStation M5 XM > - NanoBridge M5 XM > - Rocket M5 XM > - Rocket M5 XW > - Powerbeam M5 XW > - Airgrid M5HP XW > - Airgrid M5 XM > - NanoBeam M5 XW > > ePMP Elevate DevelopmentsRELEASE 1.0 - NOW AVAILABLE > > - XM + XW model > - Rocket M5 support as a SM - Dec 28, 2016 > > RELEASE 2.0 - END OF Q1 2017 > > - MikroTik Support - Alpha engagement in Q4, 2016 > - RB911G5HPnDQRT > - RBSXT5nDr2 > - RB912UAG5HPnDOT > > 2.4 XW + XM MODELS - END OF Q1, 2017DELIBERANT SUPPORT - Q2, 2017 > > > Jason Wilson > Remotely Located > Providing High Speed Internet to out of the way places. > 530-651-1736 <(530)%20651-1736> > 530-748-9608 <(530)%20748-9608> Cell > www.remotelylocated.com > > On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 8:06 AM, Stefan Englhardt <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Does this work for 11ac Mikrotiks ;-)) >> >> >> >> >> >> *Von:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *Im Auftrag von *Jason Wilson >> *Gesendet:* Mittwoch, 30. November 2016 17:03 >> *An:* [email protected] >> *Betreff:* Re: [AFMUG] Nicely done, Cambium! >> >> >> >> I tuned in to the last half of the webinar, Mikrotik is down the road, >> BUT is in the works. From a 100% Mikrotik network that is a time/cash >> saver. >> >> >> Jason Wilson >> >> Remotely Located >> >> Providing High Speed Internet to out of the way places. >> >> 530-651-1736 <(530)%20651-1736> >> >> 530-748-9608 <(530)%20748-9608> Cell >> >> www.remotelylocated.com >> >> >> >> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 7:35 AM, Jason Wilson <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> Mikrotik? >> >> >> >> On Nov 30, 2016 7:31 AM, "That One Guy /sarcasm" < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >> we have been installing epmp SMs to ubnt backhauls on small sites by >> shutting off airmax until we get a chance to get EPMP APs at the site, this >> might give us a better window >> >> >> >> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 9:28 AM, Adam Moffett <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> Compatible doesn't mean "same". Software for an Intel 386 is compatible >> with an Intel Core isn't it? >> >> >> >> Point taken though...ePMP is still 802.11n. >> >> >> >> >> >> ------ Original Message ------ >> >> From: "Stefan Englhardt" <[email protected]> >> >> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >> >> Sent: 11/30/2016 10:25:23 AM >> >> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Nicely done, Cambium! >> >> >> >> They found out that their new ePMP CPEs use the same hardware as the >> oldest UBNT-Atheros-Crap. So no porting problem. Just install the same SW. >> >> >> >> >> >> *Von:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *Im Auftrag von *That One Guy >> /sarcasm >> *Gesendet:* Mittwoch, 30. November 2016 16:12 >> *An:* [email protected] >> *Betreff:* Re: [AFMUG] Nicely done, Cambium! >> >> >> >> you have to wonder if at some point cambium hired marsellus wallace and >> some hard, pipe-hittin' people, who'll go to work on the ubnt managers >> here with a pair of pliers and a blow torch to get hardware access >> >> >> >> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 9:05 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >> im in the webinar, I didnt realize thats what the webinar was when I >> signed up for it but now im all giddy like a school girl >> >> >> >> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 8:55 AM, Joe Novak <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I prefer the Cambium direct link: http://www.cambiumnetwor >> ks.com/blog/dont-migrate---elevate/ >> >> >> >> Very interesting indeed... very interesting. >> >> >> >> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 8:50 AM, Tyler Treat < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >> This ought to shake things up a bit. >> >> >> >> http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20161130005468/en/ >> >> >> >> <http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20161130005468/en/> >> >> / <http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20161130005468/en/> >> >> www.businesswire.com >> >> / >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team >> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team >> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team >> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >> >> >> > >
