its not out yet so we will see, but I would assume it works flawless once it gets here because it works fine on airfiber PTP and its based on the same platform
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 2:24 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm < [email protected]> wrote: > does the airfiber ptmp have functional sync that actually syncs, or just > sync like titanium had sync? > > > > On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 1:19 PM, Kurt Fankhauser <[email protected] > > wrote: > >> Hopefulyl UBNT will step up their game now, its crucial to keeping prices >> low that there is strong competition among venders. I am hoping the >> Airfiber PTMP comes out soon so that this will beat Cambium back on price >> with the 450 line which is sucking my wallet dry everyday. >> >> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 1:15 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> the jist of it is like when Jesus turned water into wine, only now jesus >>> is cambium, but he wants 35 bucks for the wine >>> >>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 11:49 AM, Justin Wilson <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> http://www.mtin.net/blog/?p=1442 >>>> Some Cliff Notes >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Justin Wilson >>>> [email protected] >>>> >>>> --- >>>> http://www.mtin.net Owner/CEO >>>> xISP Solutions- Consulting – Data Centers - Bandwidth >>>> >>>> http://www.midwest-ix.com COO/Chairman >>>> Internet Exchange - Peering - Distributed Fabric >>>> >>>> On Nov 30, 2016, at 12:47 PM, Dennis Burgess <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Someone want to write up the entire thing? What it is etc? how it >>>> works vs having us all listen to a webinar :? >>>> >>>> >>>> *Dennis Burgess** –** Network Solution Engineer – Consultant * >>>> MikroTik Certified Trainer/Consultant >>>> <http://www.linktechs.net/productcart/pc/viewcontent.asp?idpage=5> – >>>> MTCNA, MTCRE, MTCWE, MTCTCE, MTCINE >>>> >>>> For Wireless Hardware/Routers visit www.linktechs.net >>>> Radio Frequiency Coverages: www.towercoverage.com >>>> Office: 314-735-0270 <(314)%20735-0270> >>>> E-Mail: [email protected] >>>> >>>> *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On >>>> Behalf Of *Steve D >>>> *Sent:* Wednesday, November 30, 2016 11:28 AM >>>> *To:* af <[email protected]> >>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Nicely done, Cambium! >>>> >>>> What, you mean they didn't just change the 5's to 3's in the GUI? >>>> >>>> Learn something new everyday. :p >>>> >>>> -Steve D >>>> >>>> On Nov 30, 2016 8:41 AM, "Bill Prince" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> There are probably hardware filters on the RF side. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> bp >>>> >>>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 11/30/2016 8:35 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm wrote: >>>> >>>> so I have a technical question. The m365 gear is ssupposed to be >>>> downconverted 5ghz, is that a software downconvert? (FCC ID issues aside) >>>> If thats the case could this be loaded onto m365 to turn it into epmp 5ghz? >>>> I assume the downconvert is more than a software load, but man, I literally >>>> would make a very inappropriate mess if I could dump the ubnt 3ghz network >>>> into epmp in one move >>>> >>>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 10:30 AM, Adam Moffett <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> 25% is what I remember. >>>> >>>> >>>> ------ Original Message ------ >>>> From: "Josh Reynolds" <[email protected]> >>>> To: [email protected] >>>> Sent: 11/30/2016 11:29:32 AM >>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Nicely done, Cambium! >>>> >>>> >>>> That's a very interesting point. I don't think their margins are that >>>> low though. They've done what, 40mil units sold? I think that was the last >>>> number I heard. >>>> >>>> On Nov 30, 2016 10:27 AM, "Kurt Fankhauser" <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> If Ubiquitis margins were low then Cambium could very well end up >>>> making more money on a radio that Ubiquiti engineered, manufactures, and >>>> delivered. Lol >>>> >>>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 11:24 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> This is capitalism in its finest form. Cambium just upped the bar >>>> substantially. The market had a very serious issue, and they solved it, >>>> while still generating substantial revenue. Im curious what their profit >>>> per hardware unit sold is compared to the profit per license, with no real >>>> liability. Hopefully this will force ubnt to really focus efforts on real >>>> sync that actually works and get an actual legitimate support channel. Or >>>> even better, sell their radios preloaded with the EPMP load and work out a >>>> discount for AP licenses through them for their customers. Mikrotik I >>>> assume is just saying "meh, our products are good" >>>> >>>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 10:10 AM, Kurt Fankhauser < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> This is pretty neat with the whole Mikrotik thing, basically you can >>>> run a Mikrotik CPE network and be GPS synchronized then... >>>> >>>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 11:08 AM, Jason Wilson < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> ePMP Elevate Compatibility >>>> >>>> *check the Release Notes for complete details* >>>> >>>> - *Loco M5 XW* >>>> - *Loco M5 XM* >>>> - *NanoStation M5 XW* >>>> - *NanoStation M5 XM* >>>> - *NanoBridge M5 XM* >>>> - *Rocket M5 XM* >>>> - *Rocket M5 XW* >>>> - *Powerbeam M5 XW* >>>> - *Airgrid M5HP XW* >>>> - *Airgrid M5 XM* >>>> - *NanoBeam M5 XW* >>>> >>>> ePMP Elevate DevelopmentsRELEASE 1.0 - NOW AVAILABLE >>>> >>>> - XM + XW model >>>> - Rocket M5 support as a SM - Dec 28, 2016 >>>> >>>> RELEASE 2.0 - END OF Q1 2017 >>>> >>>> - MikroTik Support - Alpha engagement in Q4, 2016 >>>> - RB911G5HPnDQRT >>>> - RBSXT5nDr2 >>>> - RB912UAG5HPnDOT >>>> >>>> 2.4 XW + XM MODELS - END OF Q1, 2017DELIBERANT SUPPORT - Q2, 2017 >>>> >>>> Jason Wilson >>>> Remotely Located >>>> Providing High Speed Internet to out of the way places. >>>> 530-651-1736 <%28530%29%20651-1736> >>>> 530-748-9608 <%28530%29%20748-9608> Cell >>>> www.remotelylocated.com >>>> >>>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 8:06 AM, Stefan Englhardt <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Does this work for 11ac Mikrotiks ;-)) >>>> >>>> >>>> *Von:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *Im Auftrag von *Jason Wilson >>>> *Gesendet:* Mittwoch, 30. November 2016 17:03 >>>> *An:* [email protected] >>>> *Betreff:* Re: [AFMUG] Nicely done, Cambium! >>>> >>>> I tuned in to the last half of the webinar, Mikrotik is down the road, >>>> BUT is in the works. From a 100% Mikrotik network that is a time/cash >>>> saver. >>>> >>>> Jason Wilson >>>> Remotely Located >>>> Providing High Speed Internet to out of the way places. >>>> 530-651-1736 <%28530%29%20651-1736> >>>> 530-748-9608 <%28530%29%20748-9608> Cell >>>> www.remotelylocated.com >>>> >>>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 7:35 AM, Jason Wilson < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Mikrotik? >>>> >>>> On Nov 30, 2016 7:31 AM, "That One Guy /sarcasm" < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> we have been installing epmp SMs to ubnt backhauls on small sites by >>>> shutting off airmax until we get a chance to get EPMP APs at the site, this >>>> might give us a better window >>>> >>>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 9:28 AM, Adam Moffett <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Compatible doesn't mean "same". Software for an Intel 386 is >>>> compatible with an Intel Core isn't it? >>>> >>>> Point taken though...ePMP is still 802.11n. >>>> >>>> >>>> ------ Original Message ------ >>>> From: "Stefan Englhardt" <[email protected]> >>>> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >>>> Sent: 11/30/2016 10:25:23 AM >>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Nicely done, Cambium! >>>> >>>> >>>> They found out that their new ePMP CPEs use the same hardware as the >>>> oldest UBNT-Atheros-Crap. So no porting problem. Just install the same SW. >>>> >>>> >>>> *Von:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *Im Auftrag von *That One Guy >>>> /sarcasm >>>> *Gesendet:* Mittwoch, 30. November 2016 16:12 >>>> *An:* [email protected] >>>> *Betreff:* Re: [AFMUG] Nicely done, Cambium! >>>> >>>> you have to wonder if at some point cambium hired marsellus wallace >>>> and some hard, pipe-hittin' people, who'll go to work on the ubnt >>>> managers here with a pair of pliers and a blow torch to get hardware access >>>> >>>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 9:05 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> im in the webinar, I didnt realize thats what the webinar was when I >>>> signed up for it but now im all giddy like a school girl >>>> >>>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 8:55 AM, Joe Novak <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> I prefer the Cambium direct link: http://www.cambiumnetwor >>>> ks.com/blog/dont-migrate---elevate/ >>>> >>>> Very interesting indeed... very interesting. >>>> >>>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 8:50 AM, Tyler Treat < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> This ought to shake things up a bit. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20161130005468/en/ >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> <http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20161130005468/en/> >>>> >>>> / <http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20161130005468/en/> >>>> >>>> www.businesswire.com >>>> >>>> / >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your >>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your >>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your >>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your >>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your >>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team >>> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>> >> >> > > > -- > If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team > as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >
