the jist of it is like when Jesus turned water into wine, only now jesus is cambium, but he wants 35 bucks for the wine
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 11:49 AM, Justin Wilson <li...@mtin.net> wrote: > http://www.mtin.net/blog/?p=1442 > Some Cliff Notes > > > > Justin Wilson > j...@mtin.net > > --- > http://www.mtin.net Owner/CEO > xISP Solutions- Consulting – Data Centers - Bandwidth > > http://www.midwest-ix.com COO/Chairman > Internet Exchange - Peering - Distributed Fabric > > On Nov 30, 2016, at 12:47 PM, Dennis Burgess <dmburg...@linktechs.net> > wrote: > > Someone want to write up the entire thing? What it is etc? how it works > vs having us all listen to a webinar :? > > > *Dennis Burgess** –** Network Solution Engineer – Consultant * > MikroTik Certified Trainer/Consultant > <http://www.linktechs.net/productcart/pc/viewcontent.asp?idpage=5> – > MTCNA, MTCRE, MTCWE, MTCTCE, MTCINE > > For Wireless Hardware/Routers visit www.linktechs.net > Radio Frequiency Coverages: www.towercoverage.com > Office: 314-735-0270 <(314)%20735-0270> > E-Mail: dmburg...@linktechs.net > > *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com <af-boun...@afmug.com>] *On > Behalf Of *Steve D > *Sent:* Wednesday, November 30, 2016 11:28 AM > *To:* af <af@afmug.com> > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Nicely done, Cambium! > > What, you mean they didn't just change the 5's to 3's in the GUI? > > Learn something new everyday. :p > > -Steve D > > On Nov 30, 2016 8:41 AM, "Bill Prince" <part15...@gmail.com> wrote: > > There are probably hardware filters on the RF side. > > > > bp > > <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> > > > > On 11/30/2016 8:35 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm wrote: > > so I have a technical question. The m365 gear is ssupposed to be > downconverted 5ghz, is that a software downconvert? (FCC ID issues aside) > If thats the case could this be loaded onto m365 to turn it into epmp 5ghz? > I assume the downconvert is more than a software load, but man, I literally > would make a very inappropriate mess if I could dump the ubnt 3ghz network > into epmp in one move > > On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 10:30 AM, Adam Moffett <dmmoff...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > 25% is what I remember. > > > ------ Original Message ------ > From: "Josh Reynolds" <j...@kyneticwifi.com> > To: af@afmug.com > Sent: 11/30/2016 11:29:32 AM > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Nicely done, Cambium! > > > That's a very interesting point. I don't think their margins are that low > though. They've done what, 40mil units sold? I think that was the last > number I heard. > > On Nov 30, 2016 10:27 AM, "Kurt Fankhauser" <lists.wavel...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > If Ubiquitis margins were low then Cambium could very well end up making > more money on a radio that Ubiquiti engineered, manufactures, and > delivered. Lol > > On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 11:24 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm < > thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: > > This is capitalism in its finest form. Cambium just upped the bar > substantially. The market had a very serious issue, and they solved it, > while still generating substantial revenue. Im curious what their profit > per hardware unit sold is compared to the profit per license, with no real > liability. Hopefully this will force ubnt to really focus efforts on real > sync that actually works and get an actual legitimate support channel. Or > even better, sell their radios preloaded with the EPMP load and work out a > discount for AP licenses through them for their customers. Mikrotik I > assume is just saying "meh, our products are good" > > On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 10:10 AM, Kurt Fankhauser < > lists.wavel...@gmail.com> wrote: > > This is pretty neat with the whole Mikrotik thing, basically you can run a > Mikrotik CPE network and be GPS synchronized then... > > On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 11:08 AM, Jason Wilson <ja...@remotelylocated.com> > wrote: > > ePMP Elevate Compatibility > > *check the Release Notes for complete details* > > - *Loco M5 XW* > - *Loco M5 XM* > - *NanoStation M5 XW* > - *NanoStation M5 XM* > - *NanoBridge M5 XM* > - *Rocket M5 XM* > - *Rocket M5 XW* > - *Powerbeam M5 XW* > - *Airgrid M5HP XW* > - *Airgrid M5 XM* > - *NanoBeam M5 XW* > > ePMP Elevate DevelopmentsRELEASE 1.0 - NOW AVAILABLE > > - XM + XW model > - Rocket M5 support as a SM - Dec 28, 2016 > > RELEASE 2.0 - END OF Q1 2017 > > - MikroTik Support - Alpha engagement in Q4, 2016 > - RB911G5HPnDQRT > - RBSXT5nDr2 > - RB912UAG5HPnDOT > > 2.4 XW + XM MODELS - END OF Q1, 2017DELIBERANT SUPPORT - Q2, 2017 > > Jason Wilson > Remotely Located > Providing High Speed Internet to out of the way places. > 530-651-1736 <%28530%29%20651-1736> > 530-748-9608 <%28530%29%20748-9608> Cell > www.remotelylocated.com > > On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 8:06 AM, Stefan Englhardt <s...@genias.net> wrote: > > Does this work for 11ac Mikrotiks ;-)) > > > *Von:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *Im Auftrag von *Jason Wilson > *Gesendet:* Mittwoch, 30. November 2016 17:03 > *An:* af@afmug.com > *Betreff:* Re: [AFMUG] Nicely done, Cambium! > > I tuned in to the last half of the webinar, Mikrotik is down the road, BUT > is in the works. From a 100% Mikrotik network that is a time/cash saver. > > Jason Wilson > Remotely Located > Providing High Speed Internet to out of the way places. > 530-651-1736 <%28530%29%20651-1736> > 530-748-9608 <%28530%29%20748-9608> Cell > www.remotelylocated.com > > On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 7:35 AM, Jason Wilson <ja...@remotelylocated.com> > wrote: > > Mikrotik? > > On Nov 30, 2016 7:31 AM, "That One Guy /sarcasm" < > thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: > > we have been installing epmp SMs to ubnt backhauls on small sites by > shutting off airmax until we get a chance to get EPMP APs at the site, this > might give us a better window > > On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 9:28 AM, Adam Moffett <dmmoff...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Compatible doesn't mean "same". Software for an Intel 386 is compatible > with an Intel Core isn't it? > > Point taken though...ePMP is still 802.11n. > > > ------ Original Message ------ > From: "Stefan Englhardt" <s...@genias.net> > To: "af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com> > Sent: 11/30/2016 10:25:23 AM > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Nicely done, Cambium! > > > They found out that their new ePMP CPEs use the same hardware as the > oldest UBNT-Atheros-Crap. So no porting problem. Just install the same SW. > > > *Von:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *Im Auftrag von *That One Guy > /sarcasm > *Gesendet:* Mittwoch, 30. November 2016 16:12 > *An:* af@afmug.com > *Betreff:* Re: [AFMUG] Nicely done, Cambium! > > you have to wonder if at some point cambium hired marsellus wallace and > some hard, pipe-hittin' people, who'll go to work on the ubnt managers > here with a pair of pliers and a blow torch to get hardware access > > On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 9:05 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm < > thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: > > im in the webinar, I didnt realize thats what the webinar was when I > signed up for it but now im all giddy like a school girl > > On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 8:55 AM, Joe Novak <jno...@lrcomm.com> wrote: > > I prefer the Cambium direct link: http://www. > cambiumnetworks.com/blog/dont-migrate---elevate/ > > Very interesting indeed... very interesting. > > On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 8:50 AM, Tyler Treat <tyler.tr...@cornbelttech.com> > wrote: > > This ought to shake things up a bit. > > > > http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20161130005468/en/ > > > > <http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20161130005468/en/> > > / <http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20161130005468/en/> > > www.businesswire.com > > / > > > > > > > > > -- > If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team > as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. > > > > > -- > If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team > as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. > > > > > -- > If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team > as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. > > > > > > > > > > > -- > If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team > as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. > > > > > > > -- > If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team > as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. > > > -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
