http://www.mtin.net/blog/?p=1442 <http://www.mtin.net/blog/?p=1442> Some Cliff Notes
Justin Wilson [email protected] --- http://www.mtin.net Owner/CEO xISP Solutions- Consulting – Data Centers - Bandwidth http://www.midwest-ix.com COO/Chairman Internet Exchange - Peering - Distributed Fabric > On Nov 30, 2016, at 12:47 PM, Dennis Burgess <[email protected]> wrote: > > Someone want to write up the entire thing? What it is etc? how it works vs > having us all listen to a webinar :? > > > Dennis Burgess – Network Solution Engineer – Consultant > MikroTik Certified Trainer/Consultant > <http://www.linktechs.net/productcart/pc/viewcontent.asp?idpage=5> – MTCNA, > MTCRE, MTCWE, MTCTCE, MTCINE > > For Wireless Hardware/Routers visit www.linktechs.net > <http://www.linktechs.net/> > Radio Frequiency Coverages: www.towercoverage.com > <http://www.towercoverage.com/> > Office: 314-735-0270 > E-Mail: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > > From: Af [mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>] On > Behalf Of Steve D > Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2016 11:28 AM > To: af <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Nicely done, Cambium! > > What, you mean they didn't just change the 5's to 3's in the GUI? > > Learn something new everyday. :p > > -Steve D > > On Nov 30, 2016 8:41 AM, "Bill Prince" <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > There are probably hardware filters on the RF side. > > > > bp > <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> > > On 11/30/2016 8:35 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm wrote: > so I have a technical question. The m365 gear is ssupposed to be > downconverted 5ghz, is that a software downconvert? (FCC ID issues aside) If > thats the case could this be loaded onto m365 to turn it into epmp 5ghz? I > assume the downconvert is more than a software load, but man, I literally > would make a very inappropriate mess if I could dump the ubnt 3ghz network > into epmp in one move > > On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 10:30 AM, Adam Moffett <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > 25% is what I remember. > > > ------ Original Message ------ > From: "Josh Reynolds" <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > Sent: 11/30/2016 11:29:32 AM > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Nicely done, Cambium! > > That's a very interesting point. I don't think their margins are that low > though. They've done what, 40mil units sold? I think that was the last number > I heard. > > > On Nov 30, 2016 10:27 AM, "Kurt Fankhauser" <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > If Ubiquitis margins were low then Cambium could very well end up making more > money on a radio that Ubiquiti engineered, manufactures, and delivered. Lol > > On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 11:24 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > This is capitalism in its finest form. Cambium just upped the bar > substantially. The market had a very serious issue, and they solved it, while > still generating substantial revenue. Im curious what their profit per > hardware unit sold is compared to the profit per license, with no real > liability. Hopefully this will force ubnt to really focus efforts on real > sync that actually works and get an actual legitimate support channel. Or > even better, sell their radios preloaded with the EPMP load and work out a > discount for AP licenses through them for their customers. Mikrotik I assume > is just saying "meh, our products are good" > > On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 10:10 AM, Kurt Fankhauser <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > This is pretty neat with the whole Mikrotik thing, basically you can run a > Mikrotik CPE network and be GPS synchronized then... > > On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 11:08 AM, Jason Wilson <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > ePMP Elevate Compatibility > > check the Release Notes for complete details > > Loco M5 XW > Loco M5 XM > NanoStation M5 XW > NanoStation M5 XM > NanoBridge M5 XM > Rocket M5 XM > Rocket M5 XW > Powerbeam M5 XW > Airgrid M5HP XW > Airgrid M5 XM > NanoBeam M5 XW > ePMP Elevate Developments > > RELEASE 1.0 - NOW AVAILABLE > > XM + XW model > Rocket M5 support as a SM - Dec 28, 2016 > RELEASE 2.0 - END OF Q1 2017 > > MikroTik Support - Alpha engagement in Q4, 2016 > RB911G5HPnDQRT > RBSXT5nDr2 > RB912UAG5HPnDOT > 2.4 XW + XM MODELS - END OF Q1, 2017 > > DELIBERANT SUPPORT - Q2, 2017 > > > > Jason Wilson > Remotely Located > Providing High Speed Internet to out of the way places. > 530-651-1736 <tel:%28530%29%20651-1736> > 530-748-9608 <tel:%28530%29%20748-9608> Cell > www.remotelylocated.com <http://www.remotelylocated.com/> > > On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 8:06 AM, Stefan Englhardt <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > Does this work for 11ac Mikrotiks ;-)) > > > Von: Af [mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>] Im > Auftrag von Jason Wilson > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 30. November 2016 17:03 > An: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > Betreff: Re: [AFMUG] Nicely done, Cambium! > > I tuned in to the last half of the webinar, Mikrotik is down the road, BUT is > in the works. From a 100% Mikrotik network that is a time/cash saver. > > > Jason Wilson > Remotely Located > Providing High Speed Internet to out of the way places. > 530-651-1736 <tel:%28530%29%20651-1736> > 530-748-9608 <tel:%28530%29%20748-9608> Cell > www.remotelylocated.com <http://www.remotelylocated.com/> > > On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 7:35 AM, Jason Wilson <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > Mikrotik? > > > On Nov 30, 2016 7:31 AM, "That One Guy /sarcasm" <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > we have been installing epmp SMs to ubnt backhauls on small sites by shutting > off airmax until we get a chance to get EPMP APs at the site, this might give > us a better window > > On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 9:28 AM, Adam Moffett <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > Compatible doesn't mean "same". Software for an Intel 386 is compatible with > an Intel Core isn't it? > > Point taken though...ePMP is still 802.11n. > > > ------ Original Message ------ > From: "Stefan Englhardt" <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > To: "[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > Sent: 11/30/2016 10:25:23 AM > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Nicely done, Cambium! > > They found out that their new ePMP CPEs use the same hardware as the oldest > UBNT-Atheros-Crap. So no porting problem. Just install the same SW. <> > > > Von: Af [mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>] Im > Auftrag von That One Guy /sarcasm > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 30. November 2016 16:12 > An: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > Betreff: Re: [AFMUG] Nicely done, Cambium! > > you have to wonder if at some point cambium hired marsellus wallace and some > hard, pipe-hittin' people, who'll go to work on the ubnt managers here with a > pair of pliers and a blow torch to get hardware access > > On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 9:05 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > im in the webinar, I didnt realize thats what the webinar was when I signed > up for it but now im all giddy like a school girl > > On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 8:55 AM, Joe Novak <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > I prefer the Cambium direct link: > http://www.cambiumnetworks.com/blog/dont-migrate---elevate/ > <http://www.cambiumnetworks.com/blog/dont-migrate---elevate/> > > Very interesting indeed... very interesting. > > On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 8:50 AM, Tyler Treat <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > This ought to shake things up a bit. > > > > http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20161130005468/en/ > <http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20161130005468/en/> > > > <http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20161130005468/en/> > / <http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20161130005468/en/> > www.businesswire.com <http://www.businesswire.com/> > / > > > > > > > -- > If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as > part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. > > > > -- > If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as > part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. > > > > -- > If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as > part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. > > > > > > > -- > If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as > part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. > > > > > -- > If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as > part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
