does the airfiber ptmp have functional sync that actually syncs, or just sync like titanium had sync?
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 1:19 PM, Kurt Fankhauser <[email protected]> wrote: > Hopefulyl UBNT will step up their game now, its crucial to keeping prices > low that there is strong competition among venders. I am hoping the > Airfiber PTMP comes out soon so that this will beat Cambium back on price > with the 450 line which is sucking my wallet dry everyday. > > On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 1:15 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> the jist of it is like when Jesus turned water into wine, only now jesus >> is cambium, but he wants 35 bucks for the wine >> >> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 11:49 AM, Justin Wilson <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> http://www.mtin.net/blog/?p=1442 >>> Some Cliff Notes >>> >>> >>> >>> Justin Wilson >>> [email protected] >>> >>> --- >>> http://www.mtin.net Owner/CEO >>> xISP Solutions- Consulting – Data Centers - Bandwidth >>> >>> http://www.midwest-ix.com COO/Chairman >>> Internet Exchange - Peering - Distributed Fabric >>> >>> On Nov 30, 2016, at 12:47 PM, Dennis Burgess <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Someone want to write up the entire thing? What it is etc? how it >>> works vs having us all listen to a webinar :? >>> >>> >>> *Dennis Burgess** –** Network Solution Engineer – Consultant * >>> MikroTik Certified Trainer/Consultant >>> <http://www.linktechs.net/productcart/pc/viewcontent.asp?idpage=5> – >>> MTCNA, MTCRE, MTCWE, MTCTCE, MTCINE >>> >>> For Wireless Hardware/Routers visit www.linktechs.net >>> Radio Frequiency Coverages: www.towercoverage.com >>> Office: 314-735-0270 <(314)%20735-0270> >>> E-Mail: [email protected] >>> >>> *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On >>> Behalf Of *Steve D >>> *Sent:* Wednesday, November 30, 2016 11:28 AM >>> *To:* af <[email protected]> >>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Nicely done, Cambium! >>> >>> What, you mean they didn't just change the 5's to 3's in the GUI? >>> >>> Learn something new everyday. :p >>> >>> -Steve D >>> >>> On Nov 30, 2016 8:41 AM, "Bill Prince" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> There are probably hardware filters on the RF side. >>> >>> >>> >>> bp >>> >>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> >>> >>> >>> >>> On 11/30/2016 8:35 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm wrote: >>> >>> so I have a technical question. The m365 gear is ssupposed to be >>> downconverted 5ghz, is that a software downconvert? (FCC ID issues aside) >>> If thats the case could this be loaded onto m365 to turn it into epmp 5ghz? >>> I assume the downconvert is more than a software load, but man, I literally >>> would make a very inappropriate mess if I could dump the ubnt 3ghz network >>> into epmp in one move >>> >>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 10:30 AM, Adam Moffett <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> 25% is what I remember. >>> >>> >>> ------ Original Message ------ >>> From: "Josh Reynolds" <[email protected]> >>> To: [email protected] >>> Sent: 11/30/2016 11:29:32 AM >>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Nicely done, Cambium! >>> >>> >>> That's a very interesting point. I don't think their margins are that >>> low though. They've done what, 40mil units sold? I think that was the last >>> number I heard. >>> >>> On Nov 30, 2016 10:27 AM, "Kurt Fankhauser" <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> If Ubiquitis margins were low then Cambium could very well end up making >>> more money on a radio that Ubiquiti engineered, manufactures, and >>> delivered. Lol >>> >>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 11:24 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> This is capitalism in its finest form. Cambium just upped the bar >>> substantially. The market had a very serious issue, and they solved it, >>> while still generating substantial revenue. Im curious what their profit >>> per hardware unit sold is compared to the profit per license, with no real >>> liability. Hopefully this will force ubnt to really focus efforts on real >>> sync that actually works and get an actual legitimate support channel. Or >>> even better, sell their radios preloaded with the EPMP load and work out a >>> discount for AP licenses through them for their customers. Mikrotik I >>> assume is just saying "meh, our products are good" >>> >>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 10:10 AM, Kurt Fankhauser < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> This is pretty neat with the whole Mikrotik thing, basically you can run >>> a Mikrotik CPE network and be GPS synchronized then... >>> >>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 11:08 AM, Jason Wilson < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> ePMP Elevate Compatibility >>> >>> *check the Release Notes for complete details* >>> >>> - *Loco M5 XW* >>> - *Loco M5 XM* >>> - *NanoStation M5 XW* >>> - *NanoStation M5 XM* >>> - *NanoBridge M5 XM* >>> - *Rocket M5 XM* >>> - *Rocket M5 XW* >>> - *Powerbeam M5 XW* >>> - *Airgrid M5HP XW* >>> - *Airgrid M5 XM* >>> - *NanoBeam M5 XW* >>> >>> ePMP Elevate DevelopmentsRELEASE 1.0 - NOW AVAILABLE >>> >>> - XM + XW model >>> - Rocket M5 support as a SM - Dec 28, 2016 >>> >>> RELEASE 2.0 - END OF Q1 2017 >>> >>> - MikroTik Support - Alpha engagement in Q4, 2016 >>> - RB911G5HPnDQRT >>> - RBSXT5nDr2 >>> - RB912UAG5HPnDOT >>> >>> 2.4 XW + XM MODELS - END OF Q1, 2017DELIBERANT SUPPORT - Q2, 2017 >>> >>> Jason Wilson >>> Remotely Located >>> Providing High Speed Internet to out of the way places. >>> 530-651-1736 <%28530%29%20651-1736> >>> 530-748-9608 <%28530%29%20748-9608> Cell >>> www.remotelylocated.com >>> >>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 8:06 AM, Stefan Englhardt <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Does this work for 11ac Mikrotiks ;-)) >>> >>> >>> *Von:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *Im Auftrag von *Jason Wilson >>> *Gesendet:* Mittwoch, 30. November 2016 17:03 >>> *An:* [email protected] >>> *Betreff:* Re: [AFMUG] Nicely done, Cambium! >>> >>> I tuned in to the last half of the webinar, Mikrotik is down the road, >>> BUT is in the works. From a 100% Mikrotik network that is a time/cash >>> saver. >>> >>> Jason Wilson >>> Remotely Located >>> Providing High Speed Internet to out of the way places. >>> 530-651-1736 <%28530%29%20651-1736> >>> 530-748-9608 <%28530%29%20748-9608> Cell >>> www.remotelylocated.com >>> >>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 7:35 AM, Jason Wilson <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Mikrotik? >>> >>> On Nov 30, 2016 7:31 AM, "That One Guy /sarcasm" < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> we have been installing epmp SMs to ubnt backhauls on small sites by >>> shutting off airmax until we get a chance to get EPMP APs at the site, this >>> might give us a better window >>> >>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 9:28 AM, Adam Moffett <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Compatible doesn't mean "same". Software for an Intel 386 is compatible >>> with an Intel Core isn't it? >>> >>> Point taken though...ePMP is still 802.11n. >>> >>> >>> ------ Original Message ------ >>> From: "Stefan Englhardt" <[email protected]> >>> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >>> Sent: 11/30/2016 10:25:23 AM >>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Nicely done, Cambium! >>> >>> >>> They found out that their new ePMP CPEs use the same hardware as the >>> oldest UBNT-Atheros-Crap. So no porting problem. Just install the same SW. >>> >>> >>> *Von:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *Im Auftrag von *That One Guy >>> /sarcasm >>> *Gesendet:* Mittwoch, 30. November 2016 16:12 >>> *An:* [email protected] >>> *Betreff:* Re: [AFMUG] Nicely done, Cambium! >>> >>> you have to wonder if at some point cambium hired marsellus wallace and >>> some hard, pipe-hittin' people, who'll go to work on the ubnt managers >>> here with a pair of pliers and a blow torch to get hardware access >>> >>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 9:05 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> im in the webinar, I didnt realize thats what the webinar was when I >>> signed up for it but now im all giddy like a school girl >>> >>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 8:55 AM, Joe Novak <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> I prefer the Cambium direct link: http://www.cambiumnetwor >>> ks.com/blog/dont-migrate---elevate/ >>> >>> Very interesting indeed... very interesting. >>> >>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 8:50 AM, Tyler Treat < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> This ought to shake things up a bit. >>> >>> >>> >>> http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20161130005468/en/ >>> >>> >>> >>> <http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20161130005468/en/> >>> >>> / <http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20161130005468/en/> >>> >>> www.businesswire.com >>> >>> / >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team >>> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team >>> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team >>> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team >>> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team >>> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team >> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >> > > -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
