1500m between two 30 or 60 cm dishes?
Fades *a bit* in rain? You sure you mean 1500m and not 1500 ft?
1500m is way too far for 60 GHz PTP unless you're in the Libyan desert.
On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 2:48 PM, Brett A Mansfield <
li...@silverlakeinternet.com> wrote:
> I have a few PTP 60GHz links at 1500 meters working perfectly at -61. Sure
> it fades in heavy rain a tiny bit, but no more than my 3 mile 24GHz links.
>
> I also have several PtMP links as far as 800 meters working well with -65
> or better.
>
> Thank you,
> Brett A Mansfield
>
> On May 8, 2017, at 3:43 PM, Eric Kuhnke <eric.kuh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Even if it existed 2000 ft is wildly optimistic. 60 GHz works at 600
> meters (just about 2000 ft for you Americans) between two PTP dishes
> because you have 44-45dBi gain dishes on both ends. Would not be the case
> with any sort of 60 GHz sector antenna, you'd be looking at much less gain.
>
> On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 2:39 PM, Bill Prince <part15...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Very location specific. None of our towers would be able to serve anyone
>> with that kind of range.
>>
>>
>> bp
>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>>
>>
>> On 5/8/2017 2:15 PM, Mathew Howard wrote:
>>
>> Indeed... don't underestimate what can be done with a 2000' range. I can
>> probably cover a hundred houses with that from the tower next to where I'm
>> sitting.
>>
>> On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 3:37 PM, Gino A. Villarini <g...@aeronetpr.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I concur
>>>
>>> From: Af <af-boun...@afmug.com> on behalf of Sterling Jacobson <
>>> sterl...@avative.net>
>>> Reply-To: "af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com>
>>> Date: Monday, May 8, 2017 at 4:31 PM
>>> To: "af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com>
>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 60Ghz PtMP, Why Doesn't Everyone Have It?
>>>
>>> Lots.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Lots of places.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I’ve got, and can get fiber up main roads in neighborhoods very easily.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> What costs me is the last mile backbone that winds across streets and
>>> through ROW in front of houses etc.
>>>
>>> That is the majority of my costs right there.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> If I can get in with ‘normal’ wireless pricing per AP/CPE but at
>>> 1000Mbps I can do the hybrid model easily at much less costs.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> It will be amazing for potential customers at the moment.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Might not hold up over time as bandwidth needs increase, but provides an
>>> immediate solution at a fraction of the cost of fiber, with the ‘feel’ of
>>> fiber.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com <af-boun...@afmug.com>] *On
>>> Behalf Of *Colin Stanners
>>> *Sent:* Monday, May 8, 2017 2:29 PM
>>> *To:* af@afmug.com
>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 60Ghz PtMP, Why Doesn't Everyone Have It?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> How many places do you want to install a PtMP system that goes a maximum
>>> of 1000-2000ft distance, that fiber does not work?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *Gino A. Villarini*
>>> President
>>> Metro Office Park #18 Suite 304 Guaynabo, Puerto Rico 00968
>>>
>>> <mime-attachment.png>
>>> On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 3:05 PM, Sterling Jacobson <sterl...@avative.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> What am I missing here?
>>>
>>> Can't Cambium and UBNT and others simply overlay the same radio
>>> architecture/software they have developed over a decade, on top of a 60GHz
>>> radio instead of 5Ghz?
>>>
>>> Is there some fundamental problem with using the same PHY later
>>> protocols on 60GHz vs 5GHz?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
