I'm surprised you are bothering with UBNT when a platform like ZTE is
significantly more stable.   Cheaper too.

On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 6:35 PM Jason McKemie <
[email protected]> wrote:

> The Calix active stuff is $$$$$ though, especially when you do the CSFP
> modules.  Something like the Ignitenet Fusionswitch fiber and Fiberstore
> bidi SFPs is much more reasonable.  I can sacrifice 1RU per 24 customers
> for that kind of price difference.
>
> On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 4:06 PM, George Skorup <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> If I were you, I would take a serious look at GPON shelves like ZTE and
>> Calix. CSFP modules let you put two BiDi AE customers on a single slot. 24
>> port line-card = 48 AE customers. Then I think you can do 8 or 16 port PON
>> cards, 1:32 split = 256 or 512 customers on a single 3U? 4U? chassis, + the
>> 48 AE customers. This is probably what we're going to end up doing with the
>> AE deployment we're managing now. The AE is extremely underutilized and it
>> should've been GPON from the get-go.
>>
>> If you're doing BiDi now and all the customers home-run to your cabinet,
>> put the GPON splitters at the cabinet. Cake walk. Same boat we're in.
>> Except some retrofit because they used a PAIR per customer. And Clearfield
>> built everything duplex LC. So one strand won't get used in the field. Big
>> whoop. Call the unused one a backup. I love it when nobody listens to me.
>> Coulda started BiDi and went right to GPON with minimal changes.
>>
>> On 7/31/2017 3:29 PM, Sterling Jacobson wrote:
>>
> Ok, so that is the share ratio then.
>>
>>
>>
>> If I put on 18 customers on a port they would all share the 2.5 down by
>> 1.25 up.
>>
>>
>>
>> Or if I use 8 instead 4 of the UBNT Fiber OLT I can get 9 customers on
>> that ratio.
>>
>>
>>
>> That would be 8 U plus 4 U space, which I think is probably my max amount
>> of rack space in the cabinets I am using right now.
>>
>>
>>
>> That is likely a lot less power than the 12U of 48 port switches I can
>> use right now, but the share ratio is obviously much worse in the long run.
>>
>>
>>
>> Maybe I do a Hybrid and put 4 of the OLT, and still have 4x48 ports
>> active…
>>
>>
>>
>> Then in the future if I run into clients complaining about their 1Gbps
>> rate plan not being fast enough on the share ratio of 1 to 18, I can move
>> them back to 1 to 1 active.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On
>> Behalf Of *Mike Hammett
>>
>> *Sent:* Monday, July 31, 2017 2:22 PM
>>
>>
>> *To:* [email protected]
>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] UBNT OLT Transition from Active Ethernet to GPON
>>
>>
>>
>> GPON is 2.5 downstream 1.25 upstream per port.
>>
>>
>>
>> -----
>> Mike Hammett
>> Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/>
>> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>
>> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>
>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>
>> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
>> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/>
>> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix>
>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>
>> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
>> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
>> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>
>>
>>
>> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> *From: *"Sterling Jacobson" <[email protected]>
>> *To: *"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
>> *Sent: *Monday, July 31, 2017 3:19:36 PM
>>
>>
>> *Subject: *[AFMUG] UBNT OLT Transition from Active Ethernet to GPON
>>
>> Anyone tried their PON OLT CPE and OLT 8 port (128 clients per port) 1U
>> unit?
>>
>> I see pricing around $70 retail for OLT, but haven't seen pricing yet for
>> the OLT 1U unit.
>>
>> Also, I'm active fiber right now, so I have full 1 to 1 panels in the
>> rack already.
>>
>> If I wanted to 'migrate' to OLT from active I would need some sort of
>> transition panel/setup right?
>>
>> Right now my density is 48 ports per 1U 1 to 1 single family home
>> connections.
>>
>> The UBNT Fiber OLT has 8 ports handling up to 128 clients each, with
>> 20Gbps uplink capability (not quite sure on those split details yet).
>>
>> I currently only take a max of 576 per cabinet on active, so I could
>> easily use just one of these UBNT fiber OLT units.
>> If I don't care about the share ratio I guess, I would just get another
>> 576 panel count that spliced 72 count to each port and I'm done.
>>
>> I'm unclear what that panel/splice would look like though since I've
>> never actually done GPON.
>>
>> And I would probably want to not load up that many per port, and instead
>> maybe get four of the UBNT Fiber OLT units.
>> That would take up 4U of rack space, the fanout would probably still take
>> up 4U of rack space, for a total of 8 U.
>> And I would have instead an 18 customer to 1 port on the GPON instead of
>> 72 which I like better for future use.
>>
>> Do these UFiber OLT 1U rackmount units share just 1Gbps per each of the 8
>> ports? That would only be 8Gbps needed total.
>> So I assume the GPON spec they are using can transmit more than that per
>> each of the 8 GPON ports, right?
>>
>> --
Regards,
Chuck

Reply via email to