This is fixed in the rackinjector,  and will continue through the product
line as we refresh it over the next year or so.   The limitation today has
to do with this data being stored in the expansion units themselves and
there is a total of 1024 bytes of eeprom for all descriptions and power on
values which doesn't go that far.

On Feb 2, 2018 5:22 AM, "Adam Moffett" <> wrote:

Can I vote for longer names or descriptions on things?
The character limit drives me nuts.

E.G.: I want to label a relay as "Relay1: Triggers external power relay for
West Base Station".  Right now it's more like, "Rel1 W BS".

------ Original Message ------
From: "Forrest Christian (List Account)" <>
To: "af" <>
Sent: 2/2/2018 6:54:53 AM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] [WISPA Members] 450m power

I have a preference for a switch that works.

My challenge has always been to find a chipset I trust which is fairly easy
to integrate, is obtainable, and is available in industrial temperature
range.   Over the years I've looked at numerous chipsets and have never
found any that I would feel comfortable to provide to my customers.

The industrial temperature range issue was probably the biggest one since
the vast majority of chipsets are only available in commercial range and I
refuse to ship a product which contains chipset only rated down to freezing
(there's a reason why we've never had any temperature related failures that
we can recall).   Of the remaining chipsets, many of the manufacturers only
sell to large-volume consumers.  They have no interest in doing business
with an organization which doesn't do a million units of a product.

Well the never part was true until recently.   A trusted vendor of mine
recently released a switch chipset with 5 Gigabit copper ports, 1 GBIC
port, and 1 management port, and which seems to be able to be integrated
well.   I need to spend some time with the eval board which is sitting
here, but other things have taken priority.

Over the last couple of months, we've pretty much finished all of the
pending projects, and so I'm working on figuring out which of the partially
started projects around here I need to pick up and run with.   There are
some which are minimal work which will likely get done soon (i.e. producing
medusa-compatible cambium sync products in various other form factors, and
finishing a couple of i/o board which are basically done).

Of the rest, part of what I'm going to be listening to at WISPAMERICA is
what people are needing.  I really don't want to build things people don't
want, so I'm going to be listening as to what people are looking for.
 I've got lots of ideas, just not sure how many of them are really of

On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 12:52 AM, TJ Trout <> wrote:

> Forrest,
> It would be awesome if you could ever develop products with switches
> inside, I know you have a (Cisco?) preference but other's dont.
> I would have purchased lots. I hate that I have to use a separate switch
> so we moved away from packetflux for new deployments.
> TJ
> On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 11:48 AM, Forrest Christian (List Account) <
>> wrote:
>> I'm assuming you mean includes switch+poe.
>> I'm in the process of working on something specificaly for the 450i/450m
>> with 5 ports and sync hardware all in one box (+1 SFP port), mainly
>> designed for tower top mounting.   Not far enough along to say when it will
>> ship, or even if it's ever going to see the light of day.
>> Any other solution you look at, you should make sure that whatever
>> solution you find will support at least 70W per port, and all 4 pairs.
>> Neither the 450i or 450m really care about polarity, unless you're doing
>> sync, and then only on the 450i since the 450m does the new cambium sync
>> only.
>> If you can live with separate poe box, of course the packetflux
>> powerinjector+sync powers 450m's really well.  There will be a version
>> which does medusa sync out sometime soon, it's a sure thing, just we don't
>> know timing yet.
>> On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 5:07 AM, Tyson Burris <> wrote:
>>> Good morning,
>>> Looking for an all in one, but reliable, power source for 4 - 450m aps
>>> per tower.
>>> I have heard netonix a few times but I have also heard about some issues
>>> with these devices and their support not being that great.
>>> *Tyson Burris, President*
>>>   *Internet Communications Inc.*
>>>   *739 Commerce Dr.*
>>> *
>>> <*%C2%A0+%0D+**Franklin,+IN+46131*&entry=gmail&source=g>
>>> **Franklin, IN 46131*
>>> *
>>> <*%C2%A0+%3C*%25C2%25A0%2B%250D%2B**Franklin,%2BIN%2B46131*%26entry%3Dgmail%26source%3Dg%3E+%0D+**Franklin,+IN+46131*&entry=gmail&source=g>
>>> **
>>> <*%C2%A0+%3C*%25C2%25A0%2B%250D%2B**Franklin,%2BIN%2B46131*%26entry%3Dgmail%26source%3Dg%3E+%0D+**Franklin,+IN+46131*&entry=gmail&source=g>*
>>> *317-738-0320 <317-738-0320> Daytime #*
>>> *317-412-1540 <317-412-1540> Cell/Direct #*
>>> *Online: *** <>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Members mailing list
>> --
>> *Forrest Christian* *CEO**, PacketFlux Technologies, Inc.*
>> Tel: 406-449-3345 | Address: 3577 Countryside Road, Helena, MT 59602
>> <,+Helena,+MT+59602&entry=gmail&source=g>
>> |
>> <>
>> <>  <>

*Forrest Christian* *CEO**, PacketFlux Technologies, Inc.*
Tel: 406-449-3345 | Address: 3577 Countryside Road, Helena, MT 59602
<,+Helena,+MT+59602&entry=gmail&source=g> |
<>  <>

this is fixed in thelek

Reply via email to