Could be fine for a tower-top DC+fiber fed injector(+sync)-switch. Same
concept as the UBNT edge thing. Consider that something like this would
need a 10G uplink if you're going to be powering and timing a 450m
cluster. You're probably going to want at least 500Mbps to each sector.
So only a 1G pipe up the tower isn't thinking towards the future.
Something I think a product like this would need is an integrated
voltage regulator. And wasn't something similar kicked around in the
past? Instead of a switch, make it a multi port injector+sync with media
conversion. A strand or pair per radio. Or even CWDM mux.
On 2/2/2018 6:44 AM, Mike Hammett wrote:
and some of us hate switches in their network altogether. :-)
Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/>
Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/>
The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
*From: *"TJ Trout" <t...@voltbb.com>
*Sent: *Friday, February 2, 2018 1:52:34 AM
*Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] [WISPA Members] 450m power
It would be awesome if you could ever develop products with switches
inside, I know you have a (Cisco?) preference but other's dont.
I would have purchased lots. I hate that I have to use a separate
switch so we moved away from packetflux for new deployments.
On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 11:48 AM, Forrest Christian (List Account)
<li...@packetflux.com <mailto:li...@packetflux.com>> wrote:
I'm assuming you mean includes switch+poe.
I'm in the process of working on something specificaly for the
450i/450m with 5 ports and sync hardware all in one box (+1 SFP
port), mainly designed for tower top mounting. Not far enough
along to say when it will ship, or even if it's ever going to see
the light of day.
Any other solution you look at, you should make sure that whatever
solution you find will support at least 70W per port, and all 4
pairs. Neither the 450i or 450m really care about polarity,
unless you're doing sync, and then only on the 450i since the 450m
does the new cambium sync only.
If you can live with separate poe box, of course the packetflux
powerinjector+sync powers 450m's really well. There will be a
version which does medusa sync out sometime soon, it's a sure
thing, just we don't know timing yet.
On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 5:07 AM, Tyson Burris <t...@franklinisp.net
Looking for an all in one, but reliable, power source for 4 -
450m aps per tower.
I have heard netonix a few times but I have also heard about
some issues with these devices and their support not being
*Tyson Burris, President**
**Internet Communications Inc.**
**Franklin, IN 46131**
*317-738-0320 <tel:317-738-0320> Daytime #*
*317-412-1540 <tel:317-412-1540> Cell/Direct #*
*Online: **www.surfici.net* <http://www.surfici.net>
Members mailing list
*Forrest Christian* /CEO//, PacketFlux Technologies, Inc./
Tel: 406-449-3345 | Address: 3577 Countryside Road, Helena, MT
forre...@imach.com <mailto:forre...@imach.com> |