State controlling private industry? Fascinating.
On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 11:31 AM, Sterling Jacobson <[email protected]> wrote: > What should really happen law wise, is that the state (Utah in this case) > approve a group of content filtering companies for end users. > > Then mandate AT MOST that the ISP allow/offer at least one of those up to > customers as a certified filtering option. > > > > Again, not mandatory, but as viable options that are semi-pushed from the > ISP side, still for profit. > > > > It’s just too much and too variant to have to mandate the ISP do any kind of > filtering ‘mid-stream’ style. > > > > From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Adam Moffett > Sent: Thursday, February 8, 2018 9:30 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [AFMUG] Content filtering - Trustwave > > > > Unrelated to Chuck's thread, we started talking internally about offering > content filtering as a value add. > > > > An initial conversation with Trustwave seemed promising, and I'm supposed to > have a follow up to discuss tech details later. > > > > But does anybody still do this? Is there still consumer interest? How much > are/were you selling it for? > >
