Not everyone uses the Internet at the same time bud. My point is that we have APs with 80 subs on 30mbps package and the sector hasn’t gotten past 80% utilization.
Try that with a Wi-Fi based AP in a 20mhz channel. -sean On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 11:15 PM Josh Reynolds <[email protected]> wrote: > You have 2.5G ports on that AP do you? > > Fascinating. > > On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 12:12 AM, Sean Heskett <[email protected]> wrote: > > Being able to load a 450m AP with 80 subs and deliver 30mbps service to > all > > of them at peak Netflix time in a 20mhz channel without breaking a sweat > is > > worth every penny. > > > > But it’s one tool in the tool box and isn’t the best solution for every > > deployment. > > > > 2 cents > > > > -sean > > > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 10:32 PM Josh Reynolds <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >> The more I dig into MU-MIMO, the more I realize it's not all that great. > >> > >> I am far more excited by the 9 client simultaneous transmissions in > >> 802.11ax via OFDMA. > >> > >> On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 8:00 PM, Adam Moffett <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > 450 still does a few things that ePMP doesn't. > >> > Plus there's that 14 chain MU-MIMO thing......ePMP will probably never > >> > have > >> > something like that. > >> > UI is still sluggish on ePMP. > >> > > >> > On the other hand ePMP has gotten so many feature improvements over > >> > these > >> > past few years that it's gotten really hard to argue with the value it > >> > provides. > >> > > >> > > >> > ------ Original Message ------ > >> > From: "Chuck McCown" <[email protected]> > >> > To: [email protected] > >> > Sent: 2/12/2018 8:27:56 PM > >> > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] mini wisp > >> > > >> > The UI server was probably the worst I have ever seen. > >> > > >> > So, less than 25 subs per site, what speed packages do you sell to > those > >> > 25? > >> > > >> > Packetflux GPS sync. > >> > > >> > From: Joe Novak > >> > Sent: Monday, February 12, 2018 5:20 PM > >> > To: [email protected] > >> > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] mini wisp > >> > > >> > What didn't you like about it? The interface came a long way since the > >> > early > >> > days of EPMP. We've got quite a bit deployed. A lot of people are > having > >> > weird GPS situations come up with the on-board GPS, we have this > problem > >> > once in a while too. Our packetflux sites are rock solid though. That > is > >> > assuming density isn't more then 25 per AP, because then I don't > exactly > >> > have enough experience with it. Most of our APs are sitting right > around > >> > 25 > >> > customers, and according to airtime we still have quite a bit of room. > >> > > >> > On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 6:09 PM, Jaime Solorza > >> > <[email protected]> > >> > wrote: > >> >> > >> >> I separated frequencies to three I found cleanest on AFx5s...On > Rockets > >> >> and Powerbeams I choose one frequency and shut off the rest on APs > and > >> >> on > >> >> PowerBeams I only use two...this method has worked well since August > of > >> >> 2017 > >> >> when I replaced all the radios on this network and have had to change > >> >> them > >> >> since. Two of the WISPs live in Fabens and work with us on issues. > >> >> The > >> >> other one from El Paso uses my services once in a while and works > with > >> >> us as > >> >> well. Texas Gas put up allot of 5GHz units around Fabens but still > no > >> >> issues. I used larger dishes at Wells and lift stations as well. > >> >> > >> >> Jaime Solorza > >> >> > >> >> On Feb 12, 2018 4:50 PM, "Jaime Solorza" <[email protected]> > >> >> wrote: > >> >>> > >> >>> Two AF5x on same tower, One AP on second tower 20 ft away...all > other > >> >>> radios within 4 mile radius... > >> >>> > >> >>> Jaime Solorza > >> >>> > >> >>> On Feb 12, 2018 4:43 PM, "Chuck McCown" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >>>> > >> >>>> All on the same tower, right? > >> >>>> > >> >>>> From: Jaime Solorza > >> >>>> Sent: Monday, February 12, 2018 4:41 PM > >> >>>> To: Animal Farm > >> >>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] mini wisp > >> >>>> > >> >>>> Yes..I have two AF5X links as PTP and 25 radios all in 5 GHz off 4 > >> >>>> APs > >> >>>> in Fabens, Texas sharing spectrum with 3 WISPs...no issues... > >> >>>> > >> >>>> Jaime Solorza > >> >>>> > >> >>>> On Feb 12, 2018 4:32 PM, "Chuck McCown" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> Talking to a friend that wants to build a small wisp. He is about > >> >>>>> 5.5 > >> >>>>> miles from a backbone connection. I would suggest AF5X to him but > >> >>>>> he is > >> >>>>> gonna want to use 5 GHz for his wisp I presume. > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> Can an AF5X and some 5 GHz cambium (or others) access points > >> >>>>> peacefully > >> >>>>> coexist on a tower? > >> >>>>> Very rural area. Not expecting much interference other than home > >> >>>>> routers. > >> > > >> > >
