The more I dig into MU-MIMO, the more I realize it's not all that great. I am far more excited by the 9 client simultaneous transmissions in 802.11ax via OFDMA.
On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 8:00 PM, Adam Moffett <[email protected]> wrote: > 450 still does a few things that ePMP doesn't. > Plus there's that 14 chain MU-MIMO thing......ePMP will probably never have > something like that. > UI is still sluggish on ePMP. > > On the other hand ePMP has gotten so many feature improvements over these > past few years that it's gotten really hard to argue with the value it > provides. > > > ------ Original Message ------ > From: "Chuck McCown" <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Sent: 2/12/2018 8:27:56 PM > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] mini wisp > > The UI server was probably the worst I have ever seen. > > So, less than 25 subs per site, what speed packages do you sell to those 25? > > Packetflux GPS sync. > > From: Joe Novak > Sent: Monday, February 12, 2018 5:20 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] mini wisp > > What didn't you like about it? The interface came a long way since the early > days of EPMP. We've got quite a bit deployed. A lot of people are having > weird GPS situations come up with the on-board GPS, we have this problem > once in a while too. Our packetflux sites are rock solid though. That is > assuming density isn't more then 25 per AP, because then I don't exactly > have enough experience with it. Most of our APs are sitting right around 25 > customers, and according to airtime we still have quite a bit of room. > > On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 6:09 PM, Jaime Solorza <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> I separated frequencies to three I found cleanest on AFx5s...On Rockets >> and Powerbeams I choose one frequency and shut off the rest on APs and on >> PowerBeams I only use two...this method has worked well since August of 2017 >> when I replaced all the radios on this network and have had to change them >> since. Two of the WISPs live in Fabens and work with us on issues. The >> other one from El Paso uses my services once in a while and works with us as >> well. Texas Gas put up allot of 5GHz units around Fabens but still no >> issues. I used larger dishes at Wells and lift stations as well. >> >> Jaime Solorza >> >> On Feb 12, 2018 4:50 PM, "Jaime Solorza" <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>> Two AF5x on same tower, One AP on second tower 20 ft away...all other >>> radios within 4 mile radius... >>> >>> Jaime Solorza >>> >>> On Feb 12, 2018 4:43 PM, "Chuck McCown" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> All on the same tower, right? >>>> >>>> From: Jaime Solorza >>>> Sent: Monday, February 12, 2018 4:41 PM >>>> To: Animal Farm >>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] mini wisp >>>> >>>> Yes..I have two AF5X links as PTP and 25 radios all in 5 GHz off 4 APs >>>> in Fabens, Texas sharing spectrum with 3 WISPs...no issues... >>>> >>>> Jaime Solorza >>>> >>>> On Feb 12, 2018 4:32 PM, "Chuck McCown" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Talking to a friend that wants to build a small wisp. He is about 5.5 >>>>> miles from a backbone connection. I would suggest AF5X to him but he is >>>>> gonna want to use 5 GHz for his wisp I presume. >>>>> >>>>> Can an AF5X and some 5 GHz cambium (or others) access points peacefully >>>>> coexist on a tower? >>>>> Very rural area. Not expecting much interference other than home >>>>> routers. > >
