As the agency of a system, AI will eat ecology at an exponentially
increasing rate compared to the classical use of computing in
multimedia, gaming, science, symbols etc. Because its development path
has so many requirements that will multiply the current HD indices by
many factors.
We derived energy to power the agency of work systems into mechanical
machines by reverting natural ecology that captured gas emissions and
put them underground as coal and oil, and actually managed to synthesize
them back in the air. That took human health.
The road to power the agency of intelligence (as an artificial process)
systems really looks like the dead end. This takes human life, because
the only markets where intelligence based on artificial learning can
sell are surveillance and propaganda. It can't be an opponent in gaming
and not a partner either; it can't show any sympathy for the devil nor
wake up for the Sunday morning prayer.
But artificial intelligence as a product of a viable system of learning
could ease the burden on 'human capital', because both the Marx and
Foucault frames eventually resolve 'human capital' to 'natural
intelligence'.
On 03.03.2019 21:27, justcamel wrote:
All that matters is that compound interest creates artificial scarcity
by _ALWAYS_ demanding more money back than ever was created. This
process is destroying us, our minds and sanity, our society, culture
and biosphere ... regardless of what you think it was designed for.
And by the way ... if you read the internal papers of the central
bankers who implemented the current monetary system (and it really
doesn't matter ... any monetary system based on positive interest is
just as criminal and destructive and it's been that way for 5000+
years ... just read "Debt - the first 5000 years." by David Graeber)
you will see quite clearly that they were fully aware of most of the
implications the system would have on society. They probably didn't
understand the whole #bullshitjobs, anti-economy and climate change
implications back then ... but their incentive was highly and purely
criminal.
It was designed to extract all wealth from the vast majority of the
population ... either directly via debt, via debt slavery, via
dispossession of individuals (foreclosures, etc.) or even entire
countries ... like it's happening all around the world ...
It was designed to systematically destroy the vast majority of people
in a slow and steady fashion that would not spark widespread
resistance. You only want to destroy the most "unfortunate" lowest
1-2% at any given time ... while keeping the rest of the population
under control via systemic fear. There are even papers of central
bankers which elaborate how a "healthy" population of homeless people
serves the key purpose of instilling enough systemic fear to keep the
rest paralysed ...
"The few who could understand the system will either be so interested
in its profits, or so dependent on its favours, that there will be no
opposition from that class, while on the other hand, the great body of
the people mentally incapable of comprehending the tremendous
advantage that capital derives from the system, will bear its burdens
without complaint, and perhaps without even suspecting that the system
is inimical to their interests." -- John Sherman, Rothschild ... and
that quote is the most harmless of them all.
That's what our monetary system was designed for ...
On 03/03/2019 19:50, Costi Dumitrescu wrote:
The money system is designed so
------------------------------------------
Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI
Permalink:
https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/Tbefabf50a1da4070-Md79d7b474e1816c2d1f1b0d1
Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription
