List admins always have the final decision on who stays or goes. Obvious spammers can be booted immediately without debate. For others you need to be careful because other members might object to censorship and quit out of protest. So seeking comment (or a vote) can be a good idea when sending private warnings doesn't work. It's the admin who is responsible for the success of the group by keeping knowledgeable people.
In any list, posts need to be related to the topic (AGI) by people with at least some interest in it, at least a willingness to learn. It is OK to attack ideas but not the people making them. So personally, I agree that rouncer81 had to go. ------------------------------------------ Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T234cfbcefa1d1d24-M9fcd39a4c8504c90a7b20cf7 Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription
