Erratum: suprojempive -> suprojemptive On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 9:10 AM James Bowery <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 5:41 AM Bill Hibbard via AGI <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> ... >> I vote for suppressing *racist* ravings, but allowing >> ... > > > On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 6:03 AM John Rose <[email protected]> wrote: > >> ...*racist* people to me are just ignorant and need love and kindness so >> I don't care... >> > > There's that offensive word again. > > Look guys, I'm not only a "racist" but a "supremacist" in their weaponized > vernacular. These weapons deprive people not only of their social status > but their livelihoods. Moreover, this *actual* damage occurs not only > under European governments with "hate" (another weaponized word) speech > laws, but in the US with the privatization of censorship under de facto > monopolies enjoying network effect vendor lock-in. > > So let's dissect this a little: > > My transgressive beliefs and the way I am damaged -- materially damaged -- > by these words is as follows: > > I believe the western hunter gatherers and proto-Indoeuropeans coevolved > with wolves to produce simple households and the uniquely *heritable* > individualism now measured by social scientists among "whites". I won't go > into all of the structure of my transgressive belief but rather the > consequences of it. > > This uniquely heritable individualism makes "whites" morally *superior* at > a *racial* level precisely because it stands in *opposition* to > *supremacism* under its first dictionary defined sense: The oppression of > others. People who *constitutionally* do things like come up with the US > Constitution with its protection of individual rights stand in diametric > opposition to true "supremacists". However, if you mix populations of > "whites" with *others*, the *others*, being more coherent due to their > group hunting evolution, within a civis, everything will become about group > identity. Politics becomes war conducted by other means. "Whites" lose > this war because an individual is no match for a group. > > Calling people like me "white supremacists" is what I call > "suprojempive": A supremacist projective preemptive attack. > > No one ever lost their job for calling someone like me a "white > supremacist" and causing me *actual* *damages*. > > No one ever lost their job for *being* *called* a "nigger", or any other > "racist" epithet. > > I want the social sciences to GROW THE **** UP and see lossless > compression as model selection criterion as the best hope, other than > destruction of civilization, to achieve this. > ------------------------------------------ Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T234cfbcefa1d1d24-Mc315b69087ab25145b7cf72b Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription
