Jarvis <https://github.com/cobilab/jarvis> is an example of the kind of lossless compression that social scientists should be incorporating into their unified models of society since is a major step toward removing Lewontin's Fallacy from Hamilton's Rule <http://jimbowery.blogspot.com/2005/11/removing-lewontins-fallacy-from.html>. It does population level genome compression by detecting population genetic correlation structures. Lewontin and Gould did inestimable damage to civilization by popularizing their attacks on attempts to bring the social sciences into consilience with behavioral ecology.
On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 9:21 AM James Bowery <[email protected]> wrote: > Erratum: suprojempive -> suprojemptive > > On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 9:10 AM James Bowery <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 5:41 AM Bill Hibbard via AGI < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> ... >>> I vote for suppressing *racist* ravings, but allowing >>> ... >> >> >> On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 6:03 AM John Rose <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> ...*racist* people to me are just ignorant and need love and kindness >>> so I don't care... >>> >> >> There's that offensive word again. >> >> Look guys, I'm not only a "racist" but a "supremacist" in their >> weaponized vernacular. These weapons deprive people not only of their >> social status but their livelihoods. Moreover, this *actual* damage occurs >> not only under European governments with "hate" (another weaponized word) >> speech laws, but in the US with the privatization of censorship under de >> facto monopolies enjoying network effect vendor lock-in. >> >> So let's dissect this a little: >> >> My transgressive beliefs and the way I am damaged -- materially damaged >> -- by these words is as follows: >> >> I believe the western hunter gatherers and proto-Indoeuropeans coevolved >> with wolves to produce simple households and the uniquely *heritable* >> individualism now measured by social scientists among "whites". I won't go >> into all of the structure of my transgressive belief but rather the >> consequences of it. >> >> This uniquely heritable individualism makes "whites" morally *superior* >> at a *racial* level precisely because it stands in *opposition* to >> *supremacism* under its first dictionary defined sense: The oppression of >> others. People who *constitutionally* do things like come up with the US >> Constitution with its protection of individual rights stand in diametric >> opposition to true "supremacists". However, if you mix populations of >> "whites" with *others*, the *others*, being more coherent due to their >> group hunting evolution, within a civis, everything will become about group >> identity. Politics becomes war conducted by other means. "Whites" lose >> this war because an individual is no match for a group. >> >> Calling people like me "white supremacists" is what I call >> "suprojempive": A supremacist projective preemptive attack. >> >> No one ever lost their job for calling someone like me a "white >> supremacist" and causing me *actual* *damages*. >> >> No one ever lost their job for *being* *called* a "nigger", or any other >> "racist" epithet. >> >> I want the social sciences to GROW THE **** UP and see lossless >> compression as model selection criterion as the best hope, other than >> destruction of civilization, to achieve this. >> ------------------------------------------ Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T234cfbcefa1d1d24-Mc22d4f3d41ef4c5fc189b6fe Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription
