Nanograte, I said: "I wasn't thinking of hypergraphs as being completely connected all of the time, since relationships in AI are conditional." Your response was, "This should be true for narrow AI in reductionism only, which is the more physical (in the sense of programmable) aspect of any, functional system. " This makes no sense to me. You seemed to go off on a tangent which you did not actually explain and came up with a conclusion which is almost the direct opposite of what I was saying. I was talking about AI that can be implemented with computers. If programmable computers are not relevant to what you were saying then we are talking about different things. Stochastic models, which use numbers, can be made with measurable objects where the relationships between the objects were understood as well as measurable and which different mixtures (of quantities) are relevant. But it can also include different kinds of measurable objects that may be relevant to the model can also be considered. A more liberal definition or non-traditional definition can be applied to the use of those objects as components. The objects of randomness could be formed using the members or elements of abstractions and generalizations.
------------------------------------------ Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T1675e049c274c867-M263c87817ed35c5fc56b5251 Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription
