Jim If you will, let me rephrase my direct question. A simple 'Y, N, or Not Sure' answer would suffice.
Do you think that AGI would emerge from your approach to programmable logic? On 28 Oct 2021 01:02, "Jim Bromer" <[email protected]> wrote: > Nano: You do not seem to understand what I am saying and you constantly > seem to add your own interpretations which are wrong. Your comments about > narrow AI are not relevant to what I am talking about. In order to > communicate with other people you have to have the ability to recognize > your own fallibilities. > On the other hand I believe that a language based program (that learns > through the use of human language) would have to constitute the basis for > AGI because I believe that there is another kind of artificial learning > which is not being implemented. If I know the answer why don't I just do > it? I don't have the time. But many people do not understand how a language > based AI program could be anything other than narrow AI, so perhaps you see > the futility of the effort which I totally disagree with. > *Artificial General Intelligence List <https://agi.topicbox.com/latest>* > / AGI / see discussions <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi> + > participants <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/members> + > delivery options <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription> > Permalink > <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T1675e049c274c867-Mdaa17eb5d703e4099d009077> > ------------------------------------------ Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T1675e049c274c867-Me69050af479821bfbc2828db Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription
