Are you asserting that a patient under aneasthesia is conscious? How then, if there's no memory of experience, or sensation, or cognitive interaction, do we claim human consciousness?
Just a reminder, the topic still is AGI and not the philosophy of consciousness. Meaning, the target would have to be emergent and/or programmable consciousness. "Boom done!"?, nothing of the sort! ________________________________ From: John Rose <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, 25 September 2023 21:49 To: AGI <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [agi] How AI will kill us On Monday, September 25, 2023, at 3:27 PM, Matt Mahoney wrote: OK. Give me a test for consciousness and I'll do the experiment. If you mean the Turing test then there is an easy proof. If you define consciousness as a panpsychist physical attribute then all implemented compressors would be conscious to some extent so you would need a test for non-consciousness, but everything is conscious therefore conscious compressors are better than non. Boom done. Next problem? Artificial General Intelligence List<https://agi.topicbox.com/latest> / AGI / see discussions<https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi> + participants<https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/members> + delivery options<https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription> Permalink<https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T206dd0e37a9e7407-M86ef1e4782863a7ee1ba03de> ------------------------------------------ Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T206dd0e37a9e7407-Medbffa232d8d4033018c0d15 Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription
