"If it is defined as a physical attribute across all matter, yes they would have to be."
But according to all scientific evidence, and even Dr. Stuart Hammerhoff's latest theory of anaesthetics, such patients aren't conscious at all. It's hard science. AGI pertains to human intelligence, thus human consciousness, not to all matter. ________________________________ From: John Rose <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, 26 September 2023 13:23 To: AGI <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [agi] How AI will kill us On Tuesday, September 26, 2023, at 1:02 AM, Nanograte Knowledge Technologies wrote: Are you asserting that a patient under aneasthesia is conscious? How then, if there's no memory of experience, or sensation, or cognitive interaction, do we claim human consciousness? Just a reminder, the topic still is AGI and not the philosophy of consciousness. Meaning, the target would have to be emergent and/or programmable consciousness. "Boom done!"?, nothing of the sort! LOL If it is defined as a physical attribute across all matter, yes they would have to be. I work off of a model of conscious intelligence or conscio-intelligence (CI) for AGI. Otherwise, I wouldn’t bring up the topic here so often... Mmmkay? Not everyone is all juiced up over neural networks.. though you can see how those models are evolving. Artificial General Intelligence List<https://agi.topicbox.com/latest> / AGI / see discussions<https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi> + participants<https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/members> + delivery options<https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription> Permalink<https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T206dd0e37a9e7407-Mabe80642a20350426a3b5078> ------------------------------------------ Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T206dd0e37a9e7407-M292f86826768b7087e28173f Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription
