On Sat, Oct 24, 2026 at 1:42 AM YKY (Yan King Yin, 甄景贤) < [email protected]> wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Oct 2026, 01:11 James Bowery, <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Mon, Oct 5, 2026 at 9:11 PM YKY (Yan King Yin, 甄景贤) ...The problem of >> racial bias can be eliminated or greatly reduced by making things *open* >> and *transparent* and allowing *AI adjudication*. These are the >> policies that I'm advocating for. >> > How can you advocate for AI adjudication when you advocate that LANGUAGE models use weaponized words like "racism," the "meaning" of which is primarily connotative? I suggested in 2005 that Wikipedia be the corpus for a lossless compression prize (which I first called the "C-Prize") precisely because it was riddled with such word weaponization enforced by what you call "advocacy" -- in that case by highly motivated interests. The failure by Google to adopt this objective criterion came to full fruition when Google started synthesizing Africans when asked to illustrate ancient Greek philosophers. You're not going to achieve impartial AI adjudication until lossless compression maximization is taken as the most objective way of extracting "truth" relative to a given dataset. ------------------------------------------ Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T8c5b5a041e72e8cd-M0dce434c31c03335e543f3ca Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription
