http://wiki.lesswrong.com/wiki/Map_and_Territory_(sequence)

Just saying.

/NJ/


On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 7:23 AM, Logan Streondj <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Ben Goertzel <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >> A causal set or causet is a finite, acyclic poset (details left out).
> >
> > That mathematical structure has no intrinsic relation to causality,
> though..
> >
> >>Causets have an awsome power of representation of
> >> the world.
> >
> > Sure, but cyclic graphs and hypergraphs have an even more awesome power
> ;)
> >
> >> SERGIO REPLIES> Boulder <  knocking down the tree (where `<' means
> precedes)
> >> is the causality.
> >
> > No, that is just temporal precedence between two associated events.
> > Do you actually have a definition of causality?
> >
> >> SERGIO REPLIES> I believe the physical world exists independently of
> us, and
> >> that we are physical objects part of it. And we interact with that
> physical
> >> world via our senses and muscles. I see the brain as a machine that
> helps us
> >> to survive. This is my foundational starting point. Can you explain
> yours a
> >> little more? Do you mean the physical world does not exist, that we only
> >> imagine it?
> >
> > I certainly don't embrace naive realism as you describe it, but nor do
> > I have the time to embark on a huge philosophical discussion right now
> > ;)
> >
> > Among many, many other issues, the definition of "exist" is certainly
> > not as clear as your question presumes...
> >
> > ben
> >
> >
>
> Yes lets revisit some basic definitions,
> Physics etymologically pertains to nature.
> Where Phy is to bring forth, produce, make to grow.
> In summary the summary of what has grown or been produced.
>
> Typically as with Newtonian Mechanics,
> it refers to solid body geometrical forms.
>
> Exists, Knowledge and Reality,
> fall more in the realm of Philosophy,
> the Love of Wisdom, or mental phenomena.
>
> Exists is anything that can be imagined,
> people typically require a description,
> and possibly previous experience,
> to imagine something, and agree,
> that it exists for them.
>
> Knowledge is previous experience.
> Real is an intersection of belief sets.
> Facts are elements of the real.
> True be personal experience.
>
>
> So what may be real for one group of people,
> may be false for another group of people.
> If the other group hasn't experienced.
>
> I.e. if group a has experienced computers,
> and group b does not, then computers are true for group a.
>
>
> -------------------------------------------
> AGI
> Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
> RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/20912103-eed2d0e1
> Modify Your Subscription:
> https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;
> Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
>



-------------------------------------------
AGI
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-c97d2393
Modify Your Subscription: 
https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-2484a968
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com

Reply via email to