Sergio:
> Boris, just a general comment. You need to offer some immediate incentive to > entice people to study your work. If they find summary (3 paragraphs) interesting, that should be plenty of an incentive to begin with. And so on. > I noticed the prize you offer, but you also need to entice them to move in > that direction. Something immediate, something they can actually do on their > computers, so they feel some sense of realization. That's not the kind of people that could contribute much, this work requires theoretical mindset. > Have you had any takers yet, other than consolation? Todor had one good idea, 2 years ago. But, there was too much noise-to-signal. I think my time is better spent on the work itself, vs. promoting it. If there are other mutants like me, I'll google them with *unavoidable* keywords, or vice versa. For such keywords, I am on the top of the list, & the rest is fluff. But, thanks anyway. > Why don't you say something that is both thought provoking and > compelling then. Disparaging everyone in the group is neither. http://www.cognitivealgorithm.info > I have found that while trying to reply to people who seem to act as > if they were amongst the foremost experts on the subject that I often > come up with new insights that I hadn't considered before. This is > true whether the person is a good teacher or not, whether he is > insightful or not. The insights that I have come up with in response > to some repeated exaggerations can usually be reduced to something > that common sense (borne of experience in the field) would make > apparent, but those reductions can casually strip the insight right > off the idea. So even though I have not come up with many radical new > truths in these conversations I have come up with many new ways of > seeing some aspect of the problem and some parts of the solution. > > I suppose that criticisms I have made about Mike might be applied to > anyone but even if that were true there is a still a matter of degree > of exaggeration and of utility of supposed solutions. > > Jim Bromer > > On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 5:12 PM, Boris Kazachenko <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Mike in AGI is an exact equivalent of creationist in biology. It's a sad >> commentary on the quality of minds on this list that he generates more >> discussion than anyone else here. >> >> http://www.cognitivealgorithm.info > > > ------------------------------------------- > AGI > Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now > RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/18407320-d9907b69 > Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?&; > Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com AGI | Archives | Modify Your Subscription AGI | Archives | Modify Your Subscription ------------------------------------------- AGI Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-c97d2393 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-2484a968 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
