On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 6:12 PM, Sergio Pissanetzky
<[email protected]> wrote:
 There is no geometry,
> addition, multiplication, axes, planes, rotations, etc. All that has to be
> learned just like you and

I have myself written a couple of paragraphs on the many possible
starting points of an intelligence architecture, with the most
agnostic ones being something akin to "total synthesis" in chemistry,
for example to start from 5 elements and end up with complex proteins.
The lower the starting point, the more it becomes like trying to
create a human being from charcoal and water. On the other hand, we do
have examples of humans who managed to understand our world, develop
language etc, while missing 99% of the datastream average people have
(deaf and blind babies) - their effort is very much a total synthesis,
so it can be done if you have a brain. Can it be done if you have a
pentium? It looks like our answers differ.

Of course the world does not have "geometry". Geometry is a theory
that helped Euclid, Archimedes and people like him to find how much
paint and wood they need to build a house or a boat. So interaction
with the world was necessary but not sufficient, otherwise my grandma
would be drawing isosceles triangles. But the discovery of knowledge
is only verified as knowledge by repetition both personally and
socially, it really depends on the majority's ability to follow an
algorithm and reach the same results as you. Then every now and then
appears someone who follows the algorithm and reaches new results, or
who modifies the algorithm - deciding who is in error and who is a
revolutionary scientist is intractable, probably also random and
incomprehensible. Flat earth etc.

I am assuming you are building a proto-scientist. There is a way to
drop it in the deep end of scientific endeavour: you can turn it loose
on a major website, ideally with a lot of non-expiring content and a
lot of updates, like news.bbc.co.uk . That would be the input. Sadly
for output you have to limit yourself to occasional "visitors
comments" by your system, and see how long it takes for a reasonable
comment. On a Pentium LOL. Or your system may end up hacking the BBC,
by submitting poisoned SQL and HTTP queries and controlling the free
world, you never know. But can you find the "right" invariants without
interaction, only by observation? A bit like our friend Matt wants to
understand the world by compressing audio, video and text? I think it
can't be done, and if it can it will take an extra 2 billion years (on
an Itanium!).

AT


-------------------------------------------
AGI
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-c97d2393
Modify Your Subscription: 
https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-2484a968
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com

Reply via email to